We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
On page https://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-3.0.1/libdoc/rexml/rdoc/REXML.html:
the task pages
task pages
task page for documents
task page for elements
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It seems that they exist at https://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-3.0.1/libdoc/rexml/rdoc/rexml-3_2_5/doc/rexml/tasks/rdoc/child_rdoc.html and so on: https://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-3.0.1/libdoc/rexml/rdoc/
Could you ask ruby-doc.org how to generate the documentation?
Sorry, something went wrong.
It seems that they exist at https://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-3.0.1/libdoc/rexml/rdoc/rexml-3_2_5/doc/rexml/tasks/rdoc/child_rdoc.html and so on: https://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-3.0.1/libdoc/rexml/rdoc/ Could you ask ruby-doc.org how to generate the documentation?
I think you're the right one to inquire, b/c you own rexml.
The problem, I think, is that they've included the rexml version in some of the URLs. This is an error I think b/c it's not like that inn 2.7.0.
No branches or pull requests
On page https://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-3.0.1/libdoc/rexml/rdoc/REXML.html:
the task pages
On page https://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-3.0.1/libdoc/rexml/rdoc/REXML/Document.html:
task pages
.task page for documents
.On page https://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-3.0.1/libdoc/rexml/rdoc/REXML/Element.html:
task pages
.task page for elements
.These are all good links in my local rdoc, but are bad in ruby-doc.org. I don't know how to fix.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: