CA3: Why higher SWA never return new better dpenalty results, when rpenalty is already 0?

[rualark]

Plan:

• Enable SWA logs and find if higher SWA decrease dpenalty

Maybe because without decreasing rpenalty, dpenalty is not analyzed?

[rualark]

10:00:55 Scan matrix for cantus 1 created with 21 steps of 21: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10:00:55 SWA1 #0: rp 185 from 307, dp 8, cnum 5
10:00:55 SWA1 #1: rp 124 from 307, dp 13, cnum 2
10:00:55 SWA1 #2: rp 82 from 307, dp 21, cnum 3
10:00:55 SWA1 #3: rp 23 from 307, dp 33, cnum 5
10:00:55 SWA1 #4: rp 2 from 307, dp 39, cnum 4
10:00:55 SWA1 #5: rp 0 from 307, dp 40, cnum 2
10:00:55 SWA1 #6: rp 0 from 307, dp 40, cnum 1
10:00:55 SWA2 #7: rp 0 from 307, dp 40, cnum 1
10:00:55 SWA3 #8: rp 0 from 307, dp 40, cnum 1
10:00:55 SWA4 #9: rp 0 from 307, dp 40, cnum 1
10:00:55 SWA5 #10: rp 0 from 307, dp 40, cnum 1
10:00:55 Finished SWA5 #11: rp 0 from 307, dp 40, cnum 1 (in 448 ms):
1 No melody direction (10 notes <16),
1 Constrained local range (13 notes <m6),
10:00:55 Sent corrections in 452 ms to step 192 with rp/dp/variants/lib: 0/40/1/1
10:00:55 Scan matrix for cantus 2 created with 19 steps of 19: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10:00:55 SWA1 #0: rp 34 from 105, dp 12, cnum 9
10:00:55 SWA1 #1: rp 3 from 105, dp 16, cnum 5
10:00:55 SWA1 #2: rp 1 from 105, dp 20, cnum 4
10:00:55 SWA1 #3: rp 0 from 105, dp 27, cnum 3
10:00:55 SWA1 #4: rp 0 from 105, dp 27, cnum 1
10:00:55 SWA2 #5: rp 0 from 105, dp 27, cnum 1
10:00:55 SWA3 #6: rp 0 from 105, dp 27, cnum 1
10:00:55 SWA4 #7: rp 0 from 105, dp 27, cnum 1
10:00:56 SWA5 #8: rp 0 from 105, dp 27, cnum 1
10:00:56 Finished SWA5 #9: rp 0 from 105, dp 27, cnum 1 (in 406 ms):
1 Constrained local range (13 notes <m6),
10:00:56 Sent corrections in 407 ms to step 368 with rp/dp/variants/lib: 0/27/1/1
10:00:56 Scan matrix for cantus 3 created with 21 steps of 21: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10:00:56 SWA1 #0: rp 113 from 207, dp 8, cnum 3
10:00:56 SWA1 #1: rp 64 from 207, dp 20, cnum 5
10:00:56 SWA1 #2: rp 23 from 207, dp 25, cnum 4
10:00:56 SWA1 #3: rp 22 from 207, dp 36, cnum 2
10:00:56 SWA1 #4: rp 22 from 207, dp 36, cnum 1
10:00:56 SWA2 #5: rp 21 from 207, dp 36, cnum 2
10:00:56 SWA2 #6: rp 1 from 207, dp 49, cnum 2
10:00:56 SWA2 #7: rp 1 from 207, dp 49, cnum 1
10:00:56 SWA3 #8: rp 0 from 207, dp 51, cnum 2
10:00:56 SWA3 #9: rp 0 from 207, dp 51, cnum 1
10:00:56 SWA4 #10: rp 0 from 207, dp 51, cnum 1
10:00:56 SWA5 #11: rp 0 from 207, dp 51, cnum 1
10:00:56 Finished SWA5 #12: rp 0 from 207, dp 51, cnum 1 (in 696 ms):
1 Far + far1 MDC (4th),
10:00:56 Sent corrections in 696 ms to step 560 with rp/dp/variants/lib: 0/51/1/1
10:00:56 Scan matrix for cantus 4 created with 16 steps of 17: 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10:00:56 SWA1 #0: rp 21 from 82, dp 6, cnum 5
10:00:56 SWA1 #1: rp 21 from 82, dp 6, cnum 1
10:00:56 SWA2 #2: rp 0 from 82, dp 14, cnum 3
10:00:56 SWA2 #3: rp 0 from 82, dp 14, cnum 1
10:00:56 SWA3 #4: rp 0 from 82, dp 14, cnum 1
10:00:56 SWA4 #5: rp 0 from 82, dp 14, cnum 1
10:00:56 SWA5 #6: rp 0 from 82, dp 14, cnum 1
10:00:56 Finished SWA5 #7: rp 0 from 82, dp 14, cnum 1 (in 221 ms):
1 Tonic note (>2 within 9),
10:00:56 Sent corrections in 221 ms to step 720 with rp/dp/variants/lib: 0/20/1/1
10:00:56 Scan matrix for cantus 5 created with 16 steps of 17: 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10:00:56 SWA1 #0: rp 163 from 295, dp 7, cnum 4
10:00:57 SWA1 #1: rp 102 from 295, dp 14, cnum 2
10:00:57 SWA1 #2: rp 42 from 295, dp 20, cnum 4
10:00:57 SWA1 #3: rp 41 from 295, dp 26, cnum 4
10:00:57 SWA1 #4: rp 41 from 295, dp 26, cnum 1
10:00:57 SWA2 #5: rp 21 from 295, dp 47, cnum 3
10:00:57 SWA2 #6: rp 0 from 295, dp 49, cnum 3
10:00:57 SWA2 #7: rp 0 from 295, dp 49, cnum 1
10:00:57 SWA3 #8: rp 0 from 295, dp 49, cnum 1
10:00:57 SWA4 #9: rp 0 from 295, dp 49, cnum 1
10:00:58 SWA5 #10: rp 0 from 295, dp 49, cnum 1
10:00:58 Finished SWA5 #11: rp 0 from 295, dp 49, cnum 1 (in 1108 ms):
2 No melody direction (10 notes <16),
1 No melody direction (13 notes <20),
1 Far + far1 MDC (3rd),
10:00:58 Sent corrections in 1109 ms to step 880 with rp/dp/variants/lib: 0/56/1/1
10:00:58 Scan matrix for cantus 6 created with 16 steps of 17: 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10:00:58 SWA1 #0: rp 21 from 92, dp 8, cnum 2
10:00:58 SWA1 #1: rp 0 from 92, dp 18, cnum 2
10:00:58 SWA1 #2: rp 0 from 92, dp 18, cnum 1
10:00:58 SWA2 #3: rp 0 from 92, dp 18, cnum 1
10:00:58 SWA3 #4: rp 0 from 92, dp 18, cnum 1
10:00:58 SWA4 #5: rp 0 from 92, dp 18, cnum 1
10:00:58 SWA5 #6: rp 0 from 92, dp 18, cnum 1
10:00:58 Finished SWA5 #7: rp 0 from 92, dp 18, cnum 1 (in 282 ms):
1 Tonic note (>2 within 9),
10:00:58 Sent corrections in 283 ms to step 1040 with rp/dp/variants/lib: 0/26/1/1
10:00:58 Scan matrix for cantus 7 created with 16 steps of 17: 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10:00:58 SWA1 #0: rp 0 from 183, dp 5, cnum 7
10:00:58 SWA1 #1: rp 0 from 183, dp 5, cnum 7
10:00:58 SWA2 #2: rp 0 from 183, dp 5, cnum 8
10:00:58 SWA3 #3: rp 0 from 183, dp 5, cnum 2
10:00:58 SWA4 #4: rp 0 from 183, dp 5, cnum 3
10:00:58 SWA5 #5: rp 0 from 183, dp 5, cnum 3
10:00:58 Finished SWA5 #6: rp 0 from 183, dp 5, cnum 3 (in 444 ms):
1 Stepwise motion (>4 one direction),
1 Dissonance upbeat (leap),
10:00:58 Sent corrections in 446 ms to step 1200 with rp/dp/variants/lib: 0/5/1/3
10:00:58 Scan matrix for cantus 8 created with 20 steps of 21: 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10:00:58 SWA1 #0: rp 480 from 685, dp 10, cnum 3
10:00:58 SWA1 #1: rp 277 from 685, dp 17, cnum 2
10:00:58 SWA1 #2: rp 205 from 685, dp 23, cnum 2
10:00:58 SWA1 #3: rp 142 from 685, dp 29, cnum 2
10:00:58 SWA1 #4: rp 132 from 685, dp 36, cnum 2
10:00:59 SWA1 #5: rp 132 from 685, dp 36, cnum 1
10:00:59 SWA2 #6: rp 68 from 685, dp 60, cnum 4
10:00:59 SWA2 #7: rp 27 from 685, dp 73, cnum 4
10:00:59 SWA2 #8: rp 0 from 685, dp 89, cnum 3
10:00:59 SWA2 #9: rp 0 from 685, dp 89, cnum 1
10:00:59 SWA3 #10: rp 0 from 685, dp 89, cnum 1
10:00:59 SWA4 #11: rp 0 from 685, dp 83, cnum 2
10:00:59 SWA4 #12: rp 0 from 685, dp 83, cnum 2
10:00:59 SWA5 #13: rp 0 from 685, dp 77, cnum 3
10:01:00 SWA5 #14: rp 0 from 685, dp 73, cnum 2
10:01:00 SWA5 #15: rp 0 from 685, dp 73, cnum 1
10:01:00 Finished SWA5 #16: rp 0 from 685, dp 73, cnum 1 (in 1615 ms):
2 No melody direction (10 notes <16),
2 No melody direction (13 notes <20),
1 Parallel imperfect consonances (3),
10:01:00 Sent corrections in 1617 ms to step 1392 with rp/dp/variants/lib: 0/70/1/1
10:01:00 Scan matrix for cantus 9 created with 20 steps of 21: 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10:01:00 SWA1 #0: rp 123 from 326, dp 7, cnum 2
10:01:00 SWA1 #1: rp 62 from 326, dp 14, cnum 5
10:01:00 SWA1 #2: rp 23 from 326, dp 19, cnum 3
10:01:00 SWA1 #3: rp 22 from 326, dp 25, cnum 2
10:01:00 SWA1 #4: rp 22 from 326, dp 24, cnum 2
10:01:00 SWA1 #5: rp 22 from 326, dp 24, cnum 1
10:01:00 SWA2 #6: rp 1 from 326, dp 38, cnum 2
10:01:00 SWA2 #7: rp 0 from 326, dp 32, cnum 2
10:01:00 SWA2 #8: rp 0 from 326, dp 32, cnum 1
10:01:00 SWA3 #9: rp 0 from 326, dp 32, cnum 1
10:01:00 SWA4 #10: rp 0 from 326, dp 32, cnum 1
10:01:00 SWA5 #11: rp 0 from 326, dp 32, cnum 2
10:01:00 Finished SWA5 #12: rp 0 from 326, dp 32, cnum 2 (in 401 ms):
1 No melody direction (10 notes <16),
10:01:00 Sent corrections in 402 ms to step 1584 with rp/dp/variants/lib: 0/38/1/2
10:01:00 Scan matrix for cantus 10 created with 20 steps of 21: 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10:01:00 SWA1 #0: rp 234 from 516, dp 10, cnum 7
10:01:00 SWA1 #1: rp 174 from 516, dp 22, cnum 3
10:01:00 SWA1 #2: rp 174 from 516, dp 22, cnum 1
10:01:01 SWA2 #3: rp 42 from 516, dp 40, cnum 4
10:01:01 SWA2 #4: rp 42 from 516, dp 40, cnum 1
10:01:03 SWA3 #5: rp 32 from 516, dp 55, cnum 2
10:01:05 SWA3 #6: rp 32 from 516, dp 55, cnum 1
10:01:26 SWA4 #7: rp 0 from 516, dp 78, cnum 3
10:01:26 SWA4 #8: rp 0 from 516, dp 78, cnum 1
10:01:29 SWA5 #9: rp 0 from 516, dp 78, cnum 1
10:01:29 Finished SWA5 #10: rp 0 from 516, dp 78, cnum 1 (in 28288 ms):
1 Far + far1 MDC (3rd),
10:01:29 Sent corrections in 28363 ms to step 1776 with rp/dp/variants/lib: 0/78/1/1
10:01:29 Scan matrix for cantus 11 created with 20 steps of 21: 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10:01:29 SWA1 #0: rp 168 from 191, dp 8, cnum 3
10:01:29 SWA1 #1: rp 160 from 191, dp 14, cnum 4
10:01:29 SWA1 #2: rp 124 from 191, dp 20, cnum 5
10:01:29 SWA1 #3: rp 122 from 191, dp 34, cnum 2
10:01:29 SWA1 #4: rp 101 from 191, dp 42, cnum 3
10:01:29 SWA1 #5: rp 82 from 191, dp 48, cnum 2
10:01:29 SWA1 #6: rp 21 from 191, dp 46, cnum 3
10:01:29 SWA1 #7: rp 21 from 191, dp 46, cnum 1
10:01:29 SWA2 #8: rp 21 from 191, dp 41, cnum 2
10:01:29 SWA2 #9: rp 21 from 191, dp 41, cnum 1
10:01:30 SWA3 #10: rp 0 from 191, dp 58, cnum 3
10:01:30 SWA3 #11: rp 0 from 191, dp 58, cnum 2
10:01:30 SWA4 #12: rp 0 from 191, dp 58, cnum 1
10:01:30 SWA5 #13: rp 0 from 191, dp 58, cnum 1
10:01:30 Finished SWA5 #14: rp 0 from 191, dp 58, cnum 1 (in 1307 ms):
1 Far + far1 MDC (3rd),
10:01:30 Sent corrections in 1309 ms to step 1968 with rp/dp/variants/lib: 0/58/1/1
10:01:30 Scan matrix for cantus 12 created with 20 steps of 21: 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10:01:30 SWA1 #0: rp 257 from 389, dp 12, cnum 3
10:01:30 SWA1 #1: rp 134 from 389, dp 24, cnum 7
10:01:30 SWA1 #2: rp 73 from 389, dp 28, cnum 4
10:01:30 SWA1 #3: rp 32 from 389, dp 39, cnum 4
10:01:30 SWA1 #4: rp 31 from 389, dp 46, cnum 2
10:01:30 SWA1 #5: rp 31 from 389, dp 46, cnum 1
10:01:30 SWA2 #6: rp 31 from 389, dp 46, cnum 1
10:01:31 SWA3 #7: rp 0 from 389, dp 54, cnum 2
10:01:32 SWA3 #8: rp 0 from 389, dp 54, cnum 1
10:01:32 SWA4 #9: rp 0 from 389, dp 54, cnum 1
10:01:32 SWA5 #10: rp 0 from 389, dp 54, cnum 1
10:01:32 Finished SWA5 #11: rp 0 from 389, dp 54, cnum 1 (in 2233 ms):
1 Altered neighbour (VI<->VI#),
10:01:32 Sent corrections in 2234 ms to step 2160 with rp/dp/variants/lib: 0/66/1/1

[rualark]

Only cantus 8 optimized
Probably, optimizing dpenalty without changing rpenalty is statistically difficult