Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DeepBinner on multi-fast5 followed by albacore on moved single fast5 fails. #26

Open
jnesme opened this issue Mar 5, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@jnesme
Copy link

jnesme commented Mar 5, 2019

Dear Ryan,

I was wondering if the issue I'm having was already reported. I'm using deepbinner realtime locally to demultiplex Rapid Barcoding run. I've updated deepbinner to be able to handle multi-fast5.

I then upload the whole folder with scp -r to my analysis server where I want to run Albacore using a for loop on each barcode folder. I would have then concatenated the obtained fastq where both software agrees. It was working fine until recent MinKNOW update and the multi-fast5 but now I'm having this error in Albacore where it seems it can't read the single read fast5 files produced by deepbinner/multi_to_single_fast5 output. Here's what I'm getting from Albacore pipeline.log:

2019-03-05 10:43:06,922 Submitting file "1e2ddcba-c011-4dca-99f3-9cddb76df821.fast5".
2019-03-05 10:43:06,943 Could not extract read data from file "1e2ddcba-c011-4dca-99f3-9cddb76df821.fast5".
2019-03-05 10:43:06,943 Submitting file "1e2e153f-fe84-476a-9e92-7797640ee07e.fast5".
2019-03-05 10:43:06,951 Could not extract read data from file "1e2e153f-fe84-476a-9e92-7797640ee07e.fast5".
2019-03-05 10:43:06,951 Submitting file "1e2f4690-6517-440d-b6d1-9c704a9b1900.fast5".
2019-03-05 10:43:06,963 Could not extract read data from file "1e2f4690-6517-440d-b6d1-9c704a9b1900.fast5".
2019-03-05 10:43:06,963 Submitting file "1e2f5b54-08f9-4771-9e1b-445917c8d3f6.fast5".
2019-03-05 10:43:06,983 Could not extract read data from file "1e2f5b54-08f9-4771-9e1b-445917c8d3f6.fast5".

Any idea of what might cause this issue or should I forget about the double demultiplex solution ? I was going for the double demultiplex because we did notice quite a lot of barcode crosstalk and sequencing only novel DNA templates. I guess I could just use Albacore 2.3.4 on multi-fast5 and forget the deepbinner signal level demultiplexing, although I liked the idea of being extremely stringent in the selection of reads incorporating the assembly - with Unicylcer of cours :) ...

Best regards and many thanks for those precious tools offered to the community.

@jnesme
Copy link
Author

jnesme commented Mar 7, 2019

ok sorry for posting this irrelevant issue to DeepBinner, the problem lies with using deprecated Albacore....
Works like a charm with Guppy on deepbinner sorted reads. It just lack then the two layers of barcode demultiplexing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant