Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Albacore + Porechop VS Guppy + Deepbinner #25

Open
Jaoquien opened this issue Feb 11, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Albacore + Porechop VS Guppy + Deepbinner #25

Jaoquien opened this issue Feb 11, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@Jaoquien
Copy link

Hi everyone,

Until recently we used to apply Porechop after Albacore basecalling+demultiplexing. Now, we are using Guppy to basecall and we decided to apply Deepbinner to demultiplex.

My main question is:

If we use Guppy also to demultiplex by barcode, which files should I give as an Input for Deepbinner? Because, while Porechop asks for a file directory, Deepbinner demands a *.fastq file. Should I concatenate all *.fastq (for example the desired barcode and the unclassified, both pass and fail) files to ensure that I retrieve the maximum number of reads? or what?

Thank you so much,

Quim

@mbhall88
Copy link

If you are wanting to do the same type of filtering as with Albacore + Porechop (i.e only keep reads where both programs agree) you will have to run deepbinner on each barcode directory from guppy.

Additionally, deepbinner only takes one fastq file so you will have to combine all the fastqs in a barcode bin.

@Jaoquien
Copy link
Author

@mbhall88 thank you so much for your help

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants