You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear Ryan, thanks a lot for all your very useful tools for Nanopore data handling.
I'm currently trying to demultiplex a MinION run (FLO-MIN106) barcoded with SQK-RLB001 - Rapid Low Input by PCR Barcoding Kit.
Barcodes 03; 04; 05; 06; 07; 08; 09 were used (tot. 7 barcodes)
I gave a shot at deepBinner using the Rapid model and while a lot of reads are not getting classified, there is still a fair amount that got assigned a barcode using default threshold. I was wondering if those results can be trusted in anyway ? My strategy would have been to then basecall each fast5 barcode directories with demultiplexing and then concatenate fasta for which both methods agrees, as you're suggesting for maximum stringency.
As I'm assembling fosmid inserts, I'm not too much scared by read yield but very much by barcode misclassifications.
Dear Ryan, thanks a lot for all your very useful tools for Nanopore data handling.
I'm currently trying to demultiplex a MinION run (FLO-MIN106) barcoded with SQK-RLB001 - Rapid Low Input by PCR Barcoding Kit.
Barcodes 03; 04; 05; 06; 07; 08; 09 were used (tot. 7 barcodes)
I gave a shot at deepBinner using the Rapid model and while a lot of reads are not getting classified, there is still a fair amount that got assigned a barcode using default threshold. I was wondering if those results can be trusted in anyway ? My strategy would have been to then basecall each fast5 barcode directories with demultiplexing and then concatenate fasta for which both methods agrees, as you're suggesting for maximum stringency.
As I'm assembling fosmid inserts, I'm not too much scared by read yield but very much by barcode misclassifications.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: