-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Histogram of frequencies of top-level fault codes #387
Comments
|
|
@wasowski please let me know if the changes in #400 (comment) are reasonable. Also note #400 (comment), still around 13 bugs have been labelled with |
Table 4Note for self: sum top-level codes as per the google doc codebook. BAD-SMELLS should be moved to General Programming. @ipa-hsd calculates sums, @wasowski moves to LaTeX and revises the text. @ipa-hsd: BAD-SMELL should be renamed to PROGRAMMING:BAD-SMELL in the bug files. Thanks. Table 5/6More complex, @ipa-hsd will do a proposal of mapping and we need to discuss the doubtful cases again. |
|
updated after changing |
Based on the recent issues, this list is definitely not final.
|
After all the labels related PRs were merged, these are the final numbers:
Failures:
These numbers also include |
I think it is fine to include confidential as well (not really reproducible, but with so small a number, also not distorting the picture greatly). |
@ipa-hsd thanks for calculating how many bugs for each fault code we have (Table 4 in the manuscript).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: