Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make lambda a vector instead of a scalar #42

Open
fjandrad opened this issue Aug 17, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Make lambda a vector instead of a scalar #42

fjandrad opened this issue Aug 17, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@fjandrad
Copy link
Collaborator

This can further enhance the regularization, so that we can include a degree of confidence in the reference value.
For example if the z estimation is not so bad we could increase the lambda in the z axis instead if it is bad we can decrease so that we trust more the new fitting than the previous fitting.

This could help since usually the big errors occur in the y axis while when in 2 feet the estimation from the workbench in the z axis seems not so bad.

@traversaro
Copy link
Member

This make sense.

@fjandrad
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fjandrad commented Oct 4, 2018

When estimating using just the calibration matrix from the workbench as previous is not so relevant, since on the secondary matrix test selects by itself the best lambda.

It is worth exploring in the case where there are other types of previous information such as offset information.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants