Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

clarifications on sdext and sdtrig extensions #967

Open
aap-sc opened this issue Feb 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

clarifications on sdext and sdtrig extensions #967

aap-sc opened this issue Feb 12, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@aap-sc
Copy link

aap-sc commented Feb 12, 2024

Hi!

Looking at the latest version of the specification (1.0) I see that several isa extensions are defined: Sdtrig and Sdext. Now, looking at the older version (0.13.2) I don't see that the Sdtrig or Sdext being used at all.

Does that mean that whenever I see in the document (like RISC-V profile description) Sdtrig or *Sdext - these documents refer to 1.0 specifically? Does this mean that implementations that have debug/trigger modules that are compliant with 0.13.2 version of the spec do not really implement Sdtrig and Sdext?

@pdonahue-ventana
Copy link
Collaborator

That is my understanding of how RISC-V would treat these extensions.

Both 0.13 and 1.0 are standalone documents. If you implement 0.13 then you comply with the requirements of that spec which has no Sdext or Sdtrig. If you implement 1.0 then you comply with the requirements of that spec which may involve implementing Sdext and/or Sdtrig.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants