-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
R_RISCV_32 is not a dynamic relocation for RV64 #341
Comments
Yeah, glibc only handle R_RISCV_32 on RV32, and R_RISCV_32 is only used in debug info for RV64. |
Yup. Likewise, R_RISCV_64 can be used as a dynamic relocation only on RV64. |
I am also thinking about how we describe those relocations which refer to 32/64, and might only used in RV32 / RV64. |
How about splitting the relocation into three tables for common, RV32 and RV64? |
I would like to defer fixing this after release, manipulate such complicated table on asciidoc is so painful... |
I also meet the similar problem recently, so I spend some time to see what's going on of this. Here is the behavior of aarch64 binutils,
If the symbol is ABS (absolute), then only the R_AARCH64_ABS64 with global ABS needs a dynamic relocation when building shared library; Otherwise, just resolved internally. The R_AARCH64_NONE is for ".8byte h", which is a local ABS symbol.
Considering that the symbol is address rather than ABS, R_AARCH64_ABS32 isn't allowed for 64 bits system, and the local symbol has the same limitation. Therefore, compared to RISC-V, maybe we should,
I have a patch to make GNU risc-v binutils has the same behavior as aarch64, so need your help to confirm if the above behavior is reasonable and acceptable in psabi and lld :- ) Thanks |
@Nelson1225 This is a bit off-topic because that's an implementation detail and not a part of the psABI. But I think the correct tables are https://github.com/rui314/mold/blob/67eb3069b3e7c77632c3c015a3f1324b2bab87e9/elf/input-sections.cc#L234-L249 and https://github.com/rui314/mold/blob/67eb3069b3e7c77632c3c015a3f1324b2bab87e9/elf/input-sections.cc#L251-L267. |
…symbol. There are two improvements, which are all referenced to aarch64, * R_RISCV_32 with non ABS symbol cannot be used under RV64 when making shard objects. * Don't need dynamic relocation for R_RISCV_32/64 under RV32/RV64 when making shared objects, if the referenced symbol is local ABS symbol. However, considering this link, riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc#341 Seems like we should makes all R_RISCV_32/64 relocs with ABS symbol that don't need any dynamic relocations when making the shared objects. But anyway, I just sync the current behavior as aarch64 ld, in case there are any unexpected behaviors happen. Passed the gcc/binutils regressions in riscv-gnu-toolchain. bfd/ * elfnn-riscv.c (riscv_elf_check_relocs): Only allow R_RISCV_32 with ABS symbol under RV64. (riscv_elf_relocate_section): R_RISCV_32/64 with local ABS symbol under RV32/RV64 doesn't need any dynamic relocation when making shared objects. I just make the implementations similar to other targets, so that will be more easy to mainatain. ld/ * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/data-reloc*: New testcases. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ld-riscv-elf.exp: Added new data-reloc* testcases, and need to make ifunc-seperate* testcases work for rv32. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ifunc-seperate-caller-nonplt.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ifunc-seperate-caller-plt.s: Likewise.
…symbol. There are two improvements, which are all referenced to aarch64, * R_RISCV_32 with non ABS symbol cannot be used under RV64 when making shard objects. * Don't need dynamic relocation for R_RISCV_32/64 under RV32/RV64 when making shared objects, if the referenced symbol is local ABS symbol. However, considering this link, riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc#341 Seems like we should makes all R_RISCV_32/64 relocs with ABS symbol that don't need any dynamic relocations when making the shared objects. But anyway, I just sync the current behavior as aarch64 ld, in case there are any unexpected behaviors happen. Passed the gcc/binutils regressions in riscv-gnu-toolchain. bfd/ * elfnn-riscv.c (riscv_elf_check_relocs): Only allow R_RISCV_32 with ABS symbol under RV64. (riscv_elf_relocate_section): R_RISCV_32/64 with local ABS symbol under RV32/RV64 doesn't need any dynamic relocation when making shared objects. I just make the implementations similar to other targets, so that will be more easy to mainatain. ld/ * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/data-reloc*: New testcases. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ld-riscv-elf.exp: Added new data-reloc* testcases, and need to make ifunc-seperate* testcases work for rv32. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ifunc-seperate-caller-nonplt.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ifunc-seperate-caller-plt.s: Likewise.
…symbol. There are two improvements, which are all referenced to aarch64, * R_RISCV_32 with non ABS symbol cannot be used under RV64 when making shard objects. * Don't need dynamic relocation for R_RISCV_32/64 under RV32/RV64 when making shared objects, if the referenced symbol is local ABS symbol. However, considering this link, riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc#341 Seems like we should makes all R_RISCV_32/64 relocs with ABS symbol that don't need any dynamic relocations when making the shared objects. But anyway, I just sync the current behavior as aarch64 ld, in case there are any unexpected behaviors happen. Passed the gcc/binutils regressions in riscv-gnu-toolchain. bfd/ * elfnn-riscv.c (riscv_elf_check_relocs): Only allow R_RISCV_32 with ABS symbol under RV64. (riscv_elf_relocate_section): R_RISCV_32/64 with local ABS symbol under RV32/RV64 doesn't need any dynamic relocation when making shared objects. I just make the implementations similar to other targets, so that will be more easy to mainatain. ld/ * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/data-reloc*: New testcases. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ld-riscv-elf.exp: Added new data-reloc* testcases, and need to make ifunc-seperate* testcases work for rv32. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ifunc-seperate-caller-nonplt.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ifunc-seperate-caller-plt.s: Likewise.
…symbol. There are two improvements, which are all referenced to aarch64, * R_RISCV_32 with non ABS symbol cannot be used under RV64 when making shard objects. * Don't need dynamic relocation for R_RISCV_32/64 under RV32/RV64 when making shared objects, if the referenced symbol is local ABS symbol. However, considering this link, riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc#341 Seems like we should makes all R_RISCV_32/64 relocs with ABS symbol that don't need any dynamic relocations when making the shared objects. But anyway, I just sync the current behavior as aarch64 ld, in case there are any unexpected behaviors happen. Passed the gcc/binutils regressions in riscv-gnu-toolchain. bfd/ * elfnn-riscv.c (riscv_elf_check_relocs): Only allow R_RISCV_32 with ABS symbol under RV64. (riscv_elf_relocate_section): R_RISCV_32/64 with local ABS symbol under RV32/RV64 doesn't need any dynamic relocation when making shared objects. I just make the implementations similar to other targets, so that will be more easy to mainatain. ld/ * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/data-reloc*: New testcases. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ld-riscv-elf.exp: Added new data-reloc* testcases, and need to make ifunc-seperate* testcases work for rv32. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ifunc-seperate-caller-nonplt.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ifunc-seperate-caller-plt.s: Likewise.
Currently, https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.adoc classifies
R_RISCV_32
as a "both" (dynamic and static) relocation. But it's considered a dynamic relocation only on RV32. I think we should make it clear that fact in the spec.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: