-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Final review #13
Comments
|
I had answer for IUCN, here are the files with common names: IUCN have not yet merged those files... |
@timadriaens: I will add the link to those three files in README. Could you please check that these names are the same as the ones in our tsv? Or did you already done it? Thanks. |
should we not include the common names in other languages? If you want I can do that. |
yes, we can. If you do, I am happy to check and map it further to DwC 👍 I also noticed that the names in the spreadsheets are not always correct as we think they should be, e.g. capital letters in French and English common names should be removed unless referring to a country, sin't? I also see that we are not always applying this rule: see e.g. "Pumpkinseed" which probably shoul be "pumpkinseed"? I let this issue to you as it is not my domain of expertise 😄 |
We can discuss this further if you need in #14. We leave this issue for final review. |
Data and metadata have been reviewed. |
To be reviewed:
entry_into_force
in raw data (tsv file) some are in the future, e.g. for Celastrus orbiculatus is this field set to 2027-08-02, while for Fundulus heteroclitus and_Xenopus laevis_ is 2024-08-02. I see also that in 2022 we have two very near dates:2022-07-12
and2022-08-02
. Maybe is correct, but still worth a final checkThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: