Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Site needs social media meta properties #29

Open
mzeinstra opened this issue Apr 13, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Site needs social media meta properties #29

mzeinstra opened this issue Apr 13, 2016 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@mzeinstra
Copy link
Contributor

The site lacks social media meta properties which diminishes the richness of our social media outreach.

I suggest we add something like the following (draft) on our generic header and something programmatic on our statement pages:

<link rel="canonical" href="http://rightsstatements.org/en/" />
<meta property="og:locale" content="en_EN" />
<meta property="og:type" content="website" />
<meta property="og:title" content="RightsStatements.org" />
<meta property="og:description" content="RightsStatements.org provides 11 standardized rights statements for online cultural heritage." />
<meta property="og:url" content="http://rightsstatements.org/en/" />
<meta property="og:site_name" content="RightsStatements.org" />
<meta property="og:image" content="http://rightsstatements.org/files/images/logo.svg" />
<meta name="twitter:card" content="summary_large_image" />
<meta name="twitter:description" content="RightsStatements.org provides 11 standardized rights statements for online cultural heritage." />
<meta name="twitter:title" content="RightsStatements.org" />
<meta name="twitter:image" content="http://rightsstatements.org/files/images/logo.svg" />
<meta name="twitter:creator" content="RightsStatements.org" />
@aisaac aisaac added the semantic-markup Schema.org etc label Nov 21, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants