Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

T1086.yaml - Bloodhound URL is outdated #465

Closed
phr3sh opened this issue Mar 6, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

T1086.yaml - Bloodhound URL is outdated #465

phr3sh opened this issue Mar 6, 2019 · 1 comment
Assignees
@MHaggis

Comments

@phr3sh
Copy link

phr3sh commented Mar 6, 2019

Report

The test cases set bloodurl to "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BloodHoundAD/BloodHound/master/Ingestors/BloodHound_Old.ps1"
but this resource is no longer available.

Instead bloodurl should be set to "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BloodHoundAD/BloodHound/master/Ingestors/SharpHound.ps1"

Your Environment

  • Which specific operating system are you running (e.g. Windows 7 SP1 32-bit)?
    Windows10
  • Did you run the test from an elevated or root prompt?
    No
  • If relevant, which atomic test is this specific to?
    T1086 Test UAC Bypass #2
    T1086 Test small change #3
@MHaggis MHaggis self-assigned this Mar 12, 2019
MHaggis pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2019
URLs
25c18ce 
Fix url's for issue #465
@MHaggis MHaggis mentioned this issue Mar 12, 2019
Merged
zacbrown pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2019
@MHaggis @zacbrown
BloodHound URLs - T1086 (#468)
d258111 
* URLs

Fix url's for issue #465

* Generate docs from job=validate_atomics_generate_docs branch=t1086
@MHaggis
Copy link
Contributor

MHaggis commented Mar 15, 2019

This is fixed and should be good to go!

@MHaggis MHaggis closed this as completed Mar 15, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@MHaggis MHaggis

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@MHaggis @phr3sh