Replies: 4 comments
-
In the W3C Annotation Model I see "Annotations have 0 or more Bodies." -> seems that this is the best answer. A highlight / bookmark is serialized as an annotation with no body. For a bookmark, the target selector is a "pointer" to a precise location in the content, not a range selector (segment). There must be a semantic way to disambiguate annotations / highlights and bookmarks. The |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There's a very thin line between:
Bookmarks usually target:
In some cases, bookmarks may also have accompanying tag(s) and a note from the user, but that's a more advanced use case than what's available in most apps. Highlights and annotations usually target:
The concept of highlights/annotations doesn't really exist in audiobooks. Highlights and annotations usually have a color as well, and may have variations in styles supported (for example underlined). They may also offer tags. The main difference that differentiates an annotation from a highlight being the presence of an accompanying note. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Note: in https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/#cardinality-of-bodies-and-targets, the model states that bookmarks and highlights are simply annotations with no body. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
To identify bookmarks without creation a new type ("type": "Bookmark") I've found that the W3C Annotation model defines a specific "motivation": "bookmarking" property. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Highlights and bookmarks are annotations without body.
How should we express it in the spec, so that we can serialize both?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions