Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make entry for MIBBI 'standard' more granular #43

Open
alex-ball opened this issue Feb 23, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Make entry for MIBBI 'standard' more granular #43

alex-ball opened this issue Feb 23, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@alex-ball
Copy link
Contributor

Currently all the MI* standards are grouped under the MIBBI entry. MIBBI was a coordinating project (not a standard) and the MIBBI Portal that listed the MI* standards is deprecated in favour of the BioSharing catalogue. The MI* standards do however form a coherent family and some (all?) may be expressed in terms of MIBBI Foundry modules.

Options (in decreasing order of workload):

  1. Replace the current MIBBI standard entry with the 40-ish MI* entries.
  2. Replace the current MIBBI Portal extension entry with the 40-ish MI* entries as extensions of MIBBI rather than independent standards.
  3. List the 40-ish MI* standards within the description of MIBBI.
@magpiedin
Copy link

Hi there -- Just wondering if this issue is still under consideration? And/Or if some/all the work on the RDA metadata directory is shifting over to Fairsharing.org ?

Either way, it would be handy to be able to directly reference specific standards across domains via a single registry/directory...If you need help with option 1, happy to lend a hand, unless something else is wiser in the long-run? :)

@alex-ball
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for the feedback.

The work on the RDA Metadata Standards Directory has shifted over to the RDA Metadata Standards Catalog. That will be the venue where coordination with FAIRsharing will occur, rather than here.

I think that having removed the absolute distinction between top level standards and profiles, (2) is looking like the most attractive option for the Catalog.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants