Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multi Model X-RAY Structures (2Q4M) #90

Open
lafita opened this issue Jul 1, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

Multi Model X-RAY Structures (2Q4M) #90

lafita opened this issue Jul 1, 2016 · 5 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@lafita
Copy link
Collaborator

lafita commented Jul 1, 2016

If a structure is X-RAY and multi-model, and not a biological assembly, all the models are considered for symmetry, so identity symmetry axes are returned (and a lot of levels). A test case is 2Q4M.

This bug was introduced when providing support for biological assemblies, so a check should be made that the structure is a BA before using all models.

@lafita lafita added the bug label Jul 1, 2016
@lafita lafita added this to the CeSymm-2.0 milestone Jul 1, 2016
@josemduarte
Copy link
Member

so a check should be made that the structure is a BA before using all models.

Or use the multi-chain bioassemblies

@lafita
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lafita commented Jul 1, 2016

I agree Jose, but we have the problem that we cannot display them in Jmol. Definitely it will have to be changed when Jmol allows passing structures as MMCIF.

@josemduarte
Copy link
Member

Oh jmol... forgot that :) Passing them as mmCIF to jmol should be quite easy now that we have mmCIF writers, shouldn't it?

@lafita
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lafita commented Jul 1, 2016

Yes! Everything is ready from biojava side, but the latest Maven version of Jmol is a very old one, with buggy support for mmCIF. We either request for an update of their Maven version (which I think we already did), or we move away from Jmol.

@josemduarte
Copy link
Member

Of course the maven problem... forgot that too! sorry about that.

Yes getting the latest jmol should be a priority... It even has a MMTF reader... perhaps we could even try to pass structures as MMTF.

@lafita lafita modified the milestones: CeSymm-2.0, CE-Symm 2.2 Jul 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants