Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Which version of ResNet-50 train was converted? #51

Open
vitoralbiero opened this issue Apr 22, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Which version of ResNet-50 train was converted? #51

vitoralbiero opened this issue Apr 22, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@vitoralbiero
Copy link

On the VGGFace2 paper, the authors have two versions of ResNet-50, one trained from scratch on VGGFace2 dataset, and other trained on MS-Celeb-1M and fine-tuned on VGGFace2.
Which one was converted to Keras and is in this repository?

Thank you!

@zhangdaoxian
Copy link

On the VGGFace2 paper, the authors have two versions of ResNet-50, one trained from scratch on VGGFace2 dataset, and other trained on MS-Celeb-1M and fine-tuned on VGGFace2.
Which one was converted to Keras and is in this repository?

Thank you!

I noticed that the output size of the top layer is 8631, which is the number of classes of the training set of VGGFace2, so I guess this one the trained solo on VGGFace2

@riobintang
Copy link

riobintang commented Aug 29, 2024

On the VGGFace2 paper, the authors have two versions of ResNet-50, one trained from scratch on VGGFace2 dataset, and other trained on MS-Celeb-1M and fine-tuned on VGGFace2.
Which one was converted to Keras and is in this repository?
Thank you!

I noticed that the output size of the top layer is 8631, which is the number of classes of the training set of VGGFace2, so I guess this one the trained solo on VGGFace2

Couldn't we train it on MS Celeb and then modify the last layer to fine tune on VGGFace2?
need explanation about ResNet-50

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants