You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
since this thing is intended for doing bidirectional syntax transformations,
that leads to an interesting question, should it be able to translate between A -> B -> C
and reverse arrow notation B <- C <- A
Type arrows may be reversed, thus writing c <- b <- a is equivalent to writing a -> b -> c.
The argument for it is that tis would be nice, because then composition: o: (b -> c) /\ (a -> b) -> a -> c can be read in right-to-left fashion: o: c <- a <- (c <- b) /\ (b <- a)
An arguments against include that its weird, and that it isn't a simple like the ASCII <-> unicode translations,
in that it implies flipping the input and output type
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
since this thing is intended for doing bidirectional syntax transformations,
that leads to an interesting question, should it be able to translate between
A -> B -> C
and reverse arrow notation
B <- C <- A
Twelf meta-logical framework
The argument for it is that tis would be nice, because then composition:
o: (b -> c) /\ (a -> b) -> a -> c
can be read in right-to-left fashion:o: c <- a <- (c <- b) /\ (b <- a)
An arguments against include that its weird, and that it isn't a simple like the ASCII <-> unicode translations,
in that it implies flipping the input and output type
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: