Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No run/reset connector on mechanical drawings for RPi 3 B+ #50

Open
JDat opened this issue Mar 30, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

No run/reset connector on mechanical drawings for RPi 3 B+ #50

JDat opened this issue Mar 30, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@JDat
Copy link

JDat commented Mar 30, 2018

No run/reset connector on mechanical drawings for RPi 3 B+

@JamesH65
Copy link
Contributor

@Roger-Thornton

@lurch
Copy link
Contributor

lurch commented Mar 17, 2020

https://github.com/raspberrypi/hats#faq says that a board connecting to the run/reset pins doesn't conform to the HAT spec (which is what this repo is all about).

Does https://github.com/raspberrypi/documentation/tree/master/hardware/raspberrypi/mechanical contain any of the info you're looking for? (note that it's in a different repo!)

@JDat
Copy link
Author

JDat commented Mar 17, 2020

Let's say i am designing HAT compatible board for me with watchdog function. So I need run/reset location. Is doesn't matter will it be called 100% HAT compatible. Also... It is possible to use pogo pins on HAT and get run/stop connection without soldering on RPi board.

BTW post is already 2 years old. Many things changed from that time...

@lurch
Copy link
Contributor

lurch commented Mar 17, 2020

Is doesn't matter will it be called 100% HAT compatible.

From my reading of the HAT specs, a board is either "a HAT" (meets all the guidelines) or "not a HAT" (doesn't meet all the guidelines), there's no such thing as "not 100% HAT compatible".

You're of course free to add pogo-pins to any add-on board you design, but you can't call it a HAT, and AFAIK there's no guarantee that the location of the run / reset connectors won't be moved on different / future models of Raspberry Pi.

Disclaimer: my views may not reflect those of Raspberry Pi Trading, and I'm only a software-guy not a hardware-guy 😉

@JamesH65
Copy link
Contributor

@jimbojr Any thoughts? I have no idea....

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants