Upgradeable contracts == centralized? #153
JacobInCode
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments
-
That seems like it would conflict with the DAO itself and almost go around it. This is intentional and shouldn't be changed, no? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
that is possible |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Upgradeable contracts are a point of centralized power in the rarible protocol. Obviously, having a dao mitigates risks associated but most actual contract owners are priced out of voting - maybe there should be templates available (even in factory) where upgrades are controlled by contract owners? 🔥😘😊🎉🙇♂️
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions