Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Performance: Server-side pagination: Validate Extensions #13076

Open
Tracked by #8527
richard-cox opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #8527

Performance: Server-side pagination: Validate Extensions #13076

richard-cox opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
area/performance area/server-side-pagination kind/enhancement QA/dev-automation Issues that engineers have written automation around so QA doesn't have look at this size/1 Size Estimate 1
Milestone
v2.11.0

Comments

@richard-cox
Copy link
Member

  • Confirm that with SSP on and off there's no list based regressions in 2.10 extensions
  • In the past extensions used built-in shell which contained stale / not updated versions of generic components that were updated in the host dashboard's shell. Need to investigate the affects of this with SSP
@richard-cox richard-cox added this to the v2.11.0 milestone Jan 13, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the QA/dev-automation Issues that engineers have written automation around so QA doesn't have look at this label Jan 13, 2025
@richard-cox richard-cox mentioned this issue Jan 13, 2025
Open
53 tasks
@richard-cox richard-cox added the size/1 Size Estimate 1 label Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area/performance area/server-side-pagination kind/enhancement QA/dev-automation Issues that engineers have written automation around so QA doesn't have look at this size/1 Size Estimate 1
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v2.11.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@richard-cox