You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 21, 2024. It is now read-only.
Hello, here it is. I'm also using the code I mentioned in my previous reply for parsing (and switched between Raml08 and Ram10 classes). As you can see below, description is missing for the parameter name def in RAML 8.0.
About amf prefixes, is there a way to remove it before generating RAML file? Because the CMS I'm using, does not recognize these amf variables and sees them as invalid, but If I remove them manually it becomes valid.
Good morning @postatum! I've been reviewing and have some comments regarding this issue, hope this helps:
1. When changing specs in resolution (e.x. OAS30 -> RAML10) the _compatibility pipeline_ must be used in resolution
2. Although it's technically possible, we don't support conversion to RAML08 (as far as the raml08resolver doesn't support compatibility pipeline)
I've reproduced your exact case in javascript and the code is the following:
I'm closing this issue as won't fix. If there are any questions I'll be following this thread or you can open a new issue with updated information if neccesary.
Hello, here it is. I'm also using the code I mentioned in my previous reply for parsing (and switched between Raml08 and Ram10 classes). As you can see below, description is missing for the parameter name def in RAML 8.0.
About amf prefixes, is there a way to remove it before generating RAML file? Because the CMS I'm using, does not recognize these amf variables and sees them as invalid, but If I remove them manually it becomes valid.
Input
Output RAML 0.8
Output RAML 1.0
Originally posted by @cytor in #81 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: