Look and Feel for Builder #228
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
Hi Dr. Botton! The design of Clog looks really great! I've recently taken on the endeavor of learning Clog, and I'm hoping to be able to create some really useful applications. Thank you for building Clog! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think some really cool features would be:
Over time, I believe other users would be able to create new learning content as more people use Clog for development. I'd also like to support this effort as well! I'm learning my way around the Builder, but I'd love to create tutorials for others as time goes on. :D Once again Dr. Botton, thank you for all of your effort in building Clog! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I didn't try the CLOG IDE yet. Does it support SLIME or SLY? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I still have a few small areas to fill out for the Builder's v1 branch (templates for individual panels added to projects, improvements to documentation of how DB controls work, improving the properties panel, a bit more work on the editor and REPL windows) for what I consider to be my minimum "feature complete" for version 1 builder (no worries 2.0 design already in the works, so far data modeling, many more custom controls, "views", and more).
I have already been using the builder to develop even non CLOG projects, as at this point it is a great IDE for Common Lisp over all but I'd like to get it to a point that puts it on par with emacs.
So this Is about improving the workflow of builder, better keyboard handling, the actual layout of panels, etc. I would love to see mock ups of how you feel builder's IDE should look, 1. when editing panels. 2 when editing lisp files, etc
Feel free to go nuts with your ideas. I value them and your ideas - How would you want such an IDE to look :)
This is the current L&F as of today (projects, panels, dirs and editor, repl, M-. System Browser):
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions