You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Once ggdag 0.3.0 is out, I'll need to overhaul the syntax here. Currently, it's a mix of newer and older ways of doing things.
Relatedly, in #243, I found that our habit of using a modified label geom wasn't working well for the more complex alternative DAGs in that chapter, so I explored a different style using a text repel and lighter arrows. I also learned recently that ggrepel has a newish way of having a bit more control over the repulsion that looks appealing for DAGs. So, I'd like to make sure that we're consistent with what we do, although I don't think there's one way that will always be best. This approach may have an issue with visibility for those with visual impairments because of the light-on-light colors. I'm not sure.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Once ggdag 0.3.0 is out, I'll need to overhaul the syntax here. Currently, it's a mix of newer and older ways of doing things.
Relatedly, in #243, I found that our habit of using a modified label geom wasn't working well for the more complex alternative DAGs in that chapter, so I explored a different style using a text repel and lighter arrows. I also learned recently that ggrepel has a newish way of having a bit more control over the repulsion that looks appealing for DAGs. So, I'd like to make sure that we're consistent with what we do, although I don't think there's one way that will always be best. This approach may have an issue with visibility for those with visual impairments because of the light-on-light colors. I'm not sure.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: