Section 2.1 (comment 3)

[LPardue]

Section 2.1: We do not see "version number field" in Section 17.2.1 of RFC 9000. Is "Version field" meant?

Current:
During Version
Negotiation (see Section 17.2.1 of [QUIC-TRANSPORT] and
Section 2.8), the version number field has a special value
(0x00000000)...

If so, should "version number field" be "Version field" in Section 2.8?:

Current:
Use of the version number field for
traffic recognition will therefore behave differently than with these
protocols. Using a particular version number to recognize valid QUIC
traffic is likely to persistently miss a fraction of QUIC flows and
completely fail in the near future. Reliance on the version number
field for the purposes of admission control...

[mirjak]

Yes, using "Version field" in both sections is more clear.