q-select
built-in simple filter
#11773
Unanswered
robsontenorio
asked this question in
Ideas / Proposals
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
That would only save a few letters that are the name of the function. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Calling such a function would be rather cumbersome. It is necessary to pass 1) unfiltered options (which will have to be returned from setup) 2) options, and 3) option-label. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Currently any kind of filter for q-select must be implemented manually.
For the simple cases (client side only) why not provide the basic filter out of box? This would cut a lot of boilerplate.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions