-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Evaluate technical feasability of TIB terminology service integration for ontology terms #784
Closed
1 task done
Labels
Comments
sven1103
added
enhancement
New feature or request
triage
An issue that is in discussion to be either scheduled for implepmentation or denied
labels
Aug 14, 2024
sven1103
added
core
Feature or fix task considered to be in the core product
and removed
triage
An issue that is in discussion to be either scheduled for implepmentation or denied
labels
Aug 14, 2024
Ok, given that the both the Query class in Vaadin and the TIB terminology service API support page size (or rows), limit and offset (page). |
|
KochTobi
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 19, 2024
…bility-of-tib-terminology-service-integration-for-ontology-terms
sven1103
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 20, 2024
…bility-of-tib-terminology-service-integration-for-ontology-terms
sven1103
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 22, 2024
Solves #784 and solves #734 --------- Co-authored-by: Tobias Koch <[email protected]>
1 task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
What are you missing?
Our terminology terms, e.g. for mass spec devices (see #734) need to be updated regularly to support recently added terms. However, the maintenance effort is moderate, and in case of #734 also frustrating, when file formats of ontologies suddenly break.
At the same time, the availability of recent terms is a requirement of our service portfolio. If we cannot hold the promise, why are we enforcing ontology terms in the first place.
Why do you need a solution?
I would like to evaluate the TIB terminology service API and the technical feasibility of integration, especially with Vaadin's lazy loading data provider feature.
Ideas
No response
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: