Change PEP 746 to use an attribute instead of a method

peps/pep-0746.rst

@@ -45,62 +45,47 @@ Specification
 =============
 This PEP introduces a protocol that can be used by static and runtime type checkers to validate
 the consistency between ``Annotated`` metadata and a given type.
-Objects that implement this protocol have a method named ``__supports_type__``
-that takes a single positional argument and returns ``bool``::
+Objects that implement this protocol have a property, attribute called ``__supports_type__``
+that specifies whether the metadata is valid for a given type.
 
     class Int64:
-        def __supports_type__(self, obj: int) -> bool:
-            return isinstance(obj, int)
+        __supports_type__: int
 
-The protocol being introduced would be defined as follows if it were to be defined in code form::
+The attribute may also be marked as a ``ClassVar`` to avoid interaction with dataclasses:
+
+    from dataclasses import dataclass
+    from typing import ClassVar
 
-    from typing import Protocol
-
-    class SupportsType[T](Protocol):
-        def __supports_type__(self, obj: T, /) -> bool:
-            ...
+    @dataclass
+    class Gt:
+        value: int
+        __supports_type__: ClassVar[int]
 
 When a static type checker encounters a type expression of the form ``Annotated[T, M1, M2, ...]``,
 it should enforce that for each metadata element in ``M1, M2, ...``, one of the following is true:
 
 * The metadata element evaluates to an object that does not have a ``__supports_type__`` attribute; or
-* The metadata element evaluates to an object ``M`` that implements the ``SupportsType`` protocol;
-  and, with ``T`` instantiated to a value ``v``, a call to ``M.__supports_type__(v)`` type checks without errors;
-  and that call does not evaluate to ``Literal[False]``.
+* The metadata element evaluates to an object ``M`` that has a the ``__supports_type__`` attribute;
+  and, with ``T`` instantiated to a value ``v``, ``v`` can be assigned to ``M.__supports_type__`` without error.
 
-The body of the ``__supports_type__`` method is not used to check the validity of the metadata
-and static type checkers can ignore it. However, tools that use the annotation at
-runtime may call the method to check that a particular value is valid.
-
-For example, to support a generic ``Gt`` metadata, one might write::
+To support a generic ``Gt`` metadata, one might write::
 
     from typing import Protocol
 
     class SupportsGt[T](Protocol):
         def __gt__(self, __other: T) -> bool:
             ...
-
+    
     class Gt[T]:
+        __supports_type__: ClassVar[SupportsGt[T]]
+
         def __init__(self, value: T) -> None:
             self.value = value
 
-        def __supports_type__(self, obj: SupportsGt[T], /) -> bool:
-            return obj > self.value
-
     x1: Annotated[int, Gt(0)] = 1  # OK
     x2: Annotated[str, Gt(0)] = 0  # type checker error: str is not assignable to SupportsGt[int]
     x3: Annotated[int, Gt(1)] = 0  # OK for static type checkers; runtime type checkers may flag this
 
-Implementations may be generic and may use overloads that return ``Literal[True]`` or ``Literal[False]``
-to indicate if the metadata is valid for the given type.
-
-Implementations may raise a NotImplementedError if they cannot determine if the metadata is valid for the given type.
-Tools calling ``__supports_type__`` at runtime should catch this exception and treat it as if ``__supports_type__``
-was not present; they should not take this as an indication that the metadata is invalid for the type.
-
-Tools that use the metadata at runtime may choose to ignore the implementation of ``__supports_type__``; this PEP does not
-specify how the method should be used at runtime, only that it may be available for use.
-
 Backwards Compatibility
 =======================
 
@@ -150,10 +135,19 @@ does not generally use marker base classes. In addition, it provides less flexib
 the current proposal: it would not allow overloads, and it would require metadata objects
 to add a new base class, which may make their runtime implementation more complex.
 
+Using a method instead of an attribute for ``__supports_type__``
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+We considered using a method instead of an attribute for the protocol, so that this method can be used
+at runtime to check the validity of the metadata and to support overloads or returning boolean literals.
+However using a method adds boilerplate to the implementation and the value of the runtime use cases or
+more complex scenarios involving overloads and returning boolean literals was not clear.
+
 Acknowledgments
 ===============
 
-We thank Eric Traut for suggesting the idea of using a protocol.
+We thank Eric Traut for suggesting the idea of using a protocol and implementing provisional support in Pyright.
+Thank you to Jelle Zijlstra for sponsoring this PEP.
 
 Copyright
 =========