-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 240
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add number guessing game #1082
Comments
@Diabolical5777 I would like to work upon this feature issue. Please assign it to me. |
I'll mark this as approved. @parth-verma7: As @Diabolical5777 indicated they would like to work on this first and were just waiting for approval, i'll give them a few days to indicate they would still like to do this if they are still interested. If they are not interested i'll put it up for grabs and you can take it. |
@wookie184 sure, I am open to solving issues:) |
@Diabolical5777 are you currently working upon this issue? |
Hi, If no one is working on this, I'd like to implement this feature. |
I would love to work together with someone on this feature. @sarzz2? |
Uh I was planning on doing it on my own if someone assigns me. |
@sarzz2 Sorry for the wait. I'll assign you, but if you've become uninterested, just let me know. |
Hi, I'll work on it, just to clear up in the easy, medium, hard mode the range of no. will be increased right? No. of tries remain same for each mode |
Sounds good to me. |
Description
Add a command to play a number guessing game (a random number is generated and the user guesses it, the bot says whether it's higher or lower or if they won.
Reasoning
It can be a fun game to play, perhaps more if there are different modes: easy, medium, hard.
Proposed Implementation
A game where the user can input easy, medium, or hard to increase the range of which the random number is generated from. They have 5 tries to guess the number, if they fail to do it in the 5 tries they lose. If they win, it'll mention how many tries they took.
Would you like to implement this yourself?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: