Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Node volume constraints when coupling with 2D models #397

Closed
LllC-mmd opened this issue Jul 25, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Node volume constraints when coupling with 2D models #397

LllC-mmd opened this issue Jul 25, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@LllC-mmd
Copy link

I am now developing a 2D-1D coupled hydrodynamic model where 1D hydraulic part uses SWMM as its backend.

In some discussion before #111 , I noticed there might be some constraints on the interchange flux between 2D surface and 1D sewer node based on available water storage in 2D surface area.

What I am interested that when there is drainage from 1D node to 2D surface cells, can I contain this flux by available water storage in 1D node retrieved by (

double node_getVolume(int j, double d)
).

Here I noticed that for non-storage nodes, it uses fullVolume to calculate the volume.

How does this quantity set in SWMM for non-storage nodes?

@bemcdonnell
Copy link
Member

@LllC-mmd I saw your question was answered on SWMM-USERS. If there are some coupling features that would help your research, we'd be open to integrating some of these requests into the API here. I'm going to move this over to the Discussion section.

@pyswmm pyswmm locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 28, 2023
@bemcdonnell bemcdonnell converted this issue into discussion #398 Jul 28, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants