Review form/genre terms for possible inclusion/removal from Primary Sources genre facet

[mzelesky]

I have created a report based on a July 26th, 2024 full dump of Alma of all genre/form terms found in the following places:
382a
382b
382d
382p
384a
567b
600v
610v
611v
630v
647v
648v
650v
651v
653a (second indicator 6)
655v
656v
656k
657v

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1N4H9T4S7IvXL6g_x_qVFZbyOnKm_f39n/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=115523013276933762480&rtpof=true&sd=true

The "Primary Source?" column was my attempt to tag all terms that would be considered "Primary Sources" based on the original code used to start our implementation.

[kevinreiss]

@mzelesky what action were we going to take based off the report? Confirm that all these fields are included in the facet?

[mzelesky]

I was expecting the Product Owners to view the list and identify any genre terms they'd want removed from the Primary Sources facet or added to it.

I learned that there is a group of catalogers that are looking into this, so I have shared this spreadsheet with them. I am meeting with them on November 12th.