Is including the FundsReceiver contract an instance of over-inheritance? #79
Closed
salieflewis
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
See the FundsReceiver utility here.
What's the argument here for introducing the payable functionality in this way?
Only thing that comes to me off the top of my head, is that in a way it condenses the code such that you don't have to define the same event across both 721 and 1155 presses.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions