Turbostat GUI tool to support multiple views #2
Labels
Comments
sysopenci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 13, 2023
commit 597441b3436a43011f31ce71dc0a6c0bf5ce958a upstream.
Our CI system caught a lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.3.0-rc7+ #1167 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/46 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8c6543abd650 (sb_internal#2){++++}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x5f/0x120
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffffabe61b40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x4aa/0x7a0
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa5/0xe0
kmem_cache_alloc+0x31/0x2c0
alloc_extent_state+0x1d/0xd0
__clear_extent_bit+0x2e0/0x4f0
try_release_extent_mapping+0x216/0x280
btrfs_release_folio+0x2e/0x90
invalidate_inode_pages2_range+0x397/0x470
btrfs_cleanup_dirty_bgs+0x9e/0x210
btrfs_cleanup_one_transaction+0x22/0x760
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x3b7/0x13a0
create_subvol+0x59b/0x970
btrfs_mksubvol+0x435/0x4f0
__btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x11e/0x1b0
btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xbf/0x140
btrfs_ioctl+0xa45/0x28f0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
-> #0 (sb_internal#2){++++}-{0:0}:
__lock_acquire+0x1435/0x21a0
lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2b0
start_transaction+0x401/0x730
btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x5f/0x120
btrfs_evict_inode+0x292/0x3d0
evict+0xcc/0x1d0
inode_lru_isolate+0x14d/0x1e0
__list_lru_walk_one+0xbe/0x1c0
list_lru_walk_one+0x58/0x80
prune_icache_sb+0x39/0x60
super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1f0
do_shrink_slab+0x163/0x340
shrink_slab+0x1d3/0x290
shrink_node+0x300/0x720
balance_pgdat+0x35c/0x7a0
kswapd+0x205/0x410
kthread+0xf0/0x120
ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(sb_internal#2);
lock(fs_reclaim);
lock(sb_internal#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
3 locks held by kswapd0/46:
#0: ffffffffabe61b40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x4aa/0x7a0
#1: ffffffffabe50270 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x113/0x290
#2: ffff8c6543abd0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#44){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1f0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 46 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc7+ #1167
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x58/0x90
check_noncircular+0xd6/0x100
? save_trace+0x3f/0x310
? add_lock_to_list+0x97/0x120
__lock_acquire+0x1435/0x21a0
lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2b0
? btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x5f/0x120
start_transaction+0x401/0x730
? btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x5f/0x120
btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x5f/0x120
btrfs_evict_inode+0x292/0x3d0
? lock_release+0x134/0x270
? __pfx_wake_bit_function+0x10/0x10
evict+0xcc/0x1d0
inode_lru_isolate+0x14d/0x1e0
__list_lru_walk_one+0xbe/0x1c0
? __pfx_inode_lru_isolate+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_inode_lru_isolate+0x10/0x10
list_lru_walk_one+0x58/0x80
prune_icache_sb+0x39/0x60
super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1f0
do_shrink_slab+0x163/0x340
shrink_slab+0x1d3/0x290
shrink_node+0x300/0x720
balance_pgdat+0x35c/0x7a0
kswapd+0x205/0x410
? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_kswapd+0x10/0x10
kthread+0xf0/0x120
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
</TASK>
This happens because when we abort the transaction in the transaction
commit path we call invalidate_inode_pages2_range on our block group
cache inodes (if we have space cache v1) and any delalloc inodes we may
have. The plain invalidate_inode_pages2_range() call passes through
GFP_KERNEL, which makes sense in most cases, but not here. Wrap these
two invalidate callees with memalloc_nofs_save/memalloc_nofs_restore to
make sure we don't end up with the fs reclaim dependency under the
transaction dependency.
CC: [email protected] # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
sysopenci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 13, 2023
…s happen less TODO: make this only if the tick_nohz_handler() arrived late, not early. Some broken hardware may make it arrive earlier. If there are delays in timer interrupts, or other reasons, we can have tick_nohz_handler() called in quick succession. This seems useless for low res, and can momentarily make things appear to be high res. When the tick is active, a delay in a timer interrupt does not mean the next tick will also be similarly delayed. This seems counter-intuitive when we are low res. We want the ticks to be spaced out by at least TICK_NSEC, not less. So fix that. Also for stop code, consider the following scenario in low res mode: 1. Assume ts->last_tick is 8.5ms. 2. The CPU exits from idle for some reason, and the tick is restarted. During this restart, it is determined in tick_nohz_restart() that the next tick should happen at 9.5ms (HZ=1000). This is programmed to the clock event (and also recorded into the hrtimer). 3. Just after step 2, the CPU tries to stop the tick while entering idle. During this, there is a call to tick_nohz_next_event() which sets ts->timer_expires to 10ms due to rounding to TICK_NSEC. 4. Just after this, tick_nohz_stop_tick() is called which sets ts->last_tick to 9.5ms (the value recorded in #2 into the hrtimer) and the clock event device is set to the 10ms due to ts->timer_expires. 5. Now the timer interrupt goes off at 10ms, tick_nohz_restart() is called again, and it programs the clock event to go off at the ts->last_tick + TICKNSEC which is 10.5ms. 6. Now the timer interrupt goes off at 10.5ms. The end result is, we have 2 timer interrupts that went off at a granularity of less than 1ms which causes timer wheel and hrtimers to have higher res than they otherwise would. Fix by setting ts->last_tick in projectceladon#5 to now, which is really when the last tick happened. This correct makes tick_nohz_restart() consider the most recent time that the tick timer fired. I see a similar issue where tick_nohz_handler() could also program the next timer event too quickly. For this reason, also set the tick-sched hrtimer in tick_nohz_handler() to now. With this, I don't see tick_nohz_handler() firing in quick succession. ( CHROMIUM note: I am marking it as CHROMIUM for experimentation in Finch and will push upstream after seeing results. It is possible we will just disable highres timers if the results are looking good in which case there would not be a need to push it upstream and we can just disable CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS in the builds. However, we may want to exclude <1K HZ devices such as ARM from that, or still keep the dynamic toggle option for those -- that's TBD. ) BUG=b:263289152 TEST=cyclictest --smp -p95 -m with timer_highres=0 Change-Id: I3221e458ec6265d9e4a5f68a3e0b7d1c3558be1b Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <[email protected]> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/4552437 Reviewed-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <[email protected]> Commit-Queue: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]> Tested-by: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/4572075 Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]> Tested-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <[email protected]> Auto-Submit: Hsin-Yi Wang <[email protected]> Commit-Queue: Hsin-Yi Wang <[email protected]>
sysopenci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 13, 2023
[ Upstream commit 691c041bf20899fc13c793f92ba61ab660fa3a30 ]
Cited commit causes ABBA deadlock[0] when peer flows are created while
holding the devcom rw semaphore. Due to peer flows offload implementation
the lock is taken much higher up the call chain and there is no obvious way
to easily fix the deadlock. Instead, since tc route query code needs the
peer eswitch structure only to perform a lookup in xarray and doesn't
perform any sleeping operations with it, refactor the code for lockless
execution in following ways:
- RCUify the devcom 'data' pointer. When resetting the pointer
synchronously wait for RCU grace period before returning. This is fine
since devcom is currently only used for synchronization of
pairing/unpairing of eswitches which is rare and already expensive as-is.
- Wrap all usages of 'paired' boolean in {READ|WRITE}_ONCE(). The flag has
already been used in some unlocked contexts without proper
annotations (e.g. users of mlx5_devcom_is_paired() function), but it wasn't
an issue since all relevant code paths checked it again after obtaining the
devcom semaphore. Now it is also used by mlx5_devcom_get_peer_data_rcu() as
"best effort" check to return NULL when devcom is being unpaired. Note that
while RCU read lock doesn't prevent the unpaired flag from being changed
concurrently it still guarantees that reader can continue to use 'data'.
- Refactor mlx5e_tc_query_route_vport() function to use new
mlx5_devcom_get_peer_data_rcu() API which fixes the deadlock.
[0]:
[ 164.599612] ======================================================
[ 164.600142] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 164.600667] 6.3.0-rc3+ #1 Not tainted
[ 164.601021] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 164.601557] handler1/3456 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 164.601998] ffff88811f1714b0 (&esw->offloads.encap_tbl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_attach_encap+0xd8/0x8b0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.603078]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 164.603617] ffff88810137fc98 (&comp->sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_devcom_get_peer_data+0x37/0x80 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.604459]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 164.605190]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 164.605848]
-> #1 (&comp->sem){++++}-{3:3}:
[ 164.606380] down_read+0x39/0x50
[ 164.606772] mlx5_devcom_get_peer_data+0x37/0x80 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.607336] mlx5e_tc_query_route_vport+0x86/0xc0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.607914] mlx5e_tc_tun_route_lookup+0x1a4/0x1d0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.608495] mlx5e_attach_decap_route+0xc6/0x1e0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.609063] mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow+0x1ea/0x360 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.609627] __mlx5e_add_fdb_flow+0x2d2/0x430 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.610175] mlx5e_configure_flower+0x952/0x1a20 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.610741] tc_setup_cb_add+0xd4/0x200
[ 164.611146] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x14c/0x1f0 [cls_flower]
[ 164.611661] fl_change+0xc95/0x18a0 [cls_flower]
[ 164.612116] tc_new_tfilter+0x3fc/0xd20
[ 164.612516] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x418/0x5b0
[ 164.612936] netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100
[ 164.613339] netlink_unicast+0x190/0x250
[ 164.613746] netlink_sendmsg+0x245/0x4a0
[ 164.614150] sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60
[ 164.614522] ____sys_sendmsg+0x1d0/0x1e0
[ 164.614934] ___sys_sendmsg+0x80/0xc0
[ 164.615320] __sys_sendmsg+0x51/0x90
[ 164.615701] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
[ 164.616083] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
[ 164.616568]
-> #0 (&esw->offloads.encap_tbl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 164.617210] __lock_acquire+0x159e/0x26e0
[ 164.617638] lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2a0
[ 164.618018] __mutex_lock+0x92/0xcd0
[ 164.618401] mlx5e_attach_encap+0xd8/0x8b0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.618943] post_process_attr+0x153/0x2d0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.619471] mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow+0x164/0x360 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.620021] __mlx5e_add_fdb_flow+0x2d2/0x430 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.620564] mlx5e_configure_flower+0xe33/0x1a20 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.621125] tc_setup_cb_add+0xd4/0x200
[ 164.621531] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x14c/0x1f0 [cls_flower]
[ 164.622047] fl_change+0xc95/0x18a0 [cls_flower]
[ 164.622500] tc_new_tfilter+0x3fc/0xd20
[ 164.622906] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x418/0x5b0
[ 164.623324] netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100
[ 164.623727] netlink_unicast+0x190/0x250
[ 164.624138] netlink_sendmsg+0x245/0x4a0
[ 164.624544] sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60
[ 164.624919] ____sys_sendmsg+0x1d0/0x1e0
[ 164.625340] ___sys_sendmsg+0x80/0xc0
[ 164.625731] __sys_sendmsg+0x51/0x90
[ 164.626117] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
[ 164.626502] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
[ 164.626995]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 164.627725] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 164.628268] CPU0 CPU1
[ 164.628683] ---- ----
[ 164.629098] lock(&comp->sem);
[ 164.629421] lock(&esw->offloads.encap_tbl_lock);
[ 164.630066] lock(&comp->sem);
[ 164.630555] lock(&esw->offloads.encap_tbl_lock);
[ 164.630993]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 164.631575] 3 locks held by handler1/3456:
[ 164.631962] #0: ffff888124b75130 (&block->cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: tc_setup_cb_add+0x5b/0x200
[ 164.632703] #1: ffff888116e512b8 (&esw->mode_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_esw_hold+0x39/0x50 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.633552] #2: ffff88810137fc98 (&comp->sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_devcom_get_peer_data+0x37/0x80 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.634435]
stack backtrace:
[ 164.634883] CPU: 17 PID: 3456 Comm: handler1 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc3+ #1
[ 164.635431] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 164.636340] Call Trace:
[ 164.636616] <TASK>
[ 164.636863] dump_stack_lvl+0x47/0x70
[ 164.637217] check_noncircular+0xfe/0x110
[ 164.637601] __lock_acquire+0x159e/0x26e0
[ 164.637977] ? mlx5_cmd_set_fte+0x5b0/0x830 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.638472] lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2a0
[ 164.638828] ? mlx5e_attach_encap+0xd8/0x8b0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.639339] ? lock_is_held_type+0x98/0x110
[ 164.639728] __mutex_lock+0x92/0xcd0
[ 164.640074] ? mlx5e_attach_encap+0xd8/0x8b0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.640576] ? __lock_acquire+0x382/0x26e0
[ 164.640958] ? mlx5e_attach_encap+0xd8/0x8b0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.641468] ? mlx5e_attach_encap+0xd8/0x8b0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.641965] mlx5e_attach_encap+0xd8/0x8b0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.642454] ? lock_release+0xbf/0x240
[ 164.642819] post_process_attr+0x153/0x2d0 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.643318] mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow+0x164/0x360 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.643835] __mlx5e_add_fdb_flow+0x2d2/0x430 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.644340] mlx5e_configure_flower+0xe33/0x1a20 [mlx5_core]
[ 164.644862] ? lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2a0
[ 164.645219] tc_setup_cb_add+0xd4/0x200
[ 164.645588] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x14c/0x1f0 [cls_flower]
[ 164.646067] fl_change+0xc95/0x18a0 [cls_flower]
[ 164.646488] tc_new_tfilter+0x3fc/0xd20
[ 164.646861] ? tc_del_tfilter+0x810/0x810
[ 164.647236] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x418/0x5b0
[ 164.647621] ? rtnl_setlink+0x160/0x160
[ 164.647982] netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100
[ 164.648348] netlink_unicast+0x190/0x250
[ 164.648722] netlink_sendmsg+0x245/0x4a0
[ 164.649090] sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60
[ 164.649434] ____sys_sendmsg+0x1d0/0x1e0
[ 164.649804] ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x6d/0xa0
[ 164.650213] ___sys_sendmsg+0x80/0xc0
[ 164.650563] ? lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2a0
[ 164.650926] ? lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2a0
[ 164.651286] ? __fget_files+0x5/0x190
[ 164.651644] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
[ 164.652006] ? __fget_files+0xb9/0x190
[ 164.652365] ? lock_release+0xbf/0x240
[ 164.652723] ? __fget_files+0xd3/0x190
[ 164.653079] __sys_sendmsg+0x51/0x90
[ 164.653435] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90
[ 164.653784] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
[ 164.654229] RIP: 0033:0x7f378054f8bd
[ 164.654577] Code: 28 89 54 24 1c 48 89 74 24 10 89 7c 24 08 e8 6a c3 f4 ff 8b 54 24 1c 48 8b 74 24 10 41 89 c0 8b 7c 24 08 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 33 44 89 c7 48 89 44 24 08 e8 be c3 f4 ff 48
[ 164.656041] RSP: 002b:00007f377fa114b0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e
[ 164.656701] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f378054f8bd
[ 164.657297] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007f377fa11540 RDI: 0000000000000014
[ 164.657885] RBP: 00007f377fa12278 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000015c
[ 164.658472] R10: 00007f377fa123d0 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000560962d99bd0
[ 164.665317] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000560962d99bd0 R15: 00007f377fa11540
Fixes: f9d196b ("net/mlx5e: Use correct eswitch for stack devices with lag")
Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
sysopenci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 13, 2023
…phys
[ Upstream commit 85d38d5810e285d5aec7fb5283107d1da70c12a9 ]
When booting with "intremap=off" and "x2apic_phys" on the kernel command
line, the physical x2APIC driver ends up being used even when x2APIC
mode is disabled ("intremap=off" disables x2APIC mode). This happens
because the first compound condition check in x2apic_phys_probe() is
false due to x2apic_mode == 0 and so the following one returns true
after default_acpi_madt_oem_check() having already selected the physical
x2APIC driver.
This results in the following panic:
kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c:2409!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.4.0-rc2-ver4.1rc2 #2
Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R6515/07PXPY, BIOS 2.3.6 07/06/2021
RIP: 0010:setup_IO_APIC+0x9c/0xaf0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? native_read_msr
apic_intr_mode_init
x86_late_time_init
start_kernel
x86_64_start_reservations
x86_64_start_kernel
secondary_startup_64_no_verify
</TASK>
which is:
setup_IO_APIC:
apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs\n");
for_each_ioapic(ioapic)
BUG_ON(mp_irqdomain_create(ioapic));
Return 0 to denote that x2APIC has not been enabled when probing the
physical x2APIC driver.
[ bp: Massage commit message heavily. ]
Fixes: 9ebd680 ("x86, apic: Use probe routines to simplify apic selection")
Signed-off-by: Dheeraj Kumar Srivastava <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Vasant Hegde <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
sysopenci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2024
commit 667574e873b5f77a220b2a93329689f36fb56d5d upstream.
When tries to demote 1G hugetlb folios, a lockdep warning is observed:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.10.0-rc6-00452-ga4d0275fa660-dirty #79 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
bash/710 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8f0a7850 (&h->resize_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: demote_store+0x244/0x460
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8f0a6f48 (&h->resize_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: demote_store+0xae/0x460
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&h->resize_lock);
lock(&h->resize_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by bash/710:
#0: ffff8f118439c3f0 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x64/0xe0
#1: ffff8f11893b9e88 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xf8/0x1d0
#2: ffff8f1183dc4428 (kn->active#98){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x100/0x1d0
#3: ffffffff8f0a6f48 (&h->resize_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: demote_store+0xae/0x460
stack backtrace:
CPU: 3 PID: 710 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.10.0-rc6-00452-ga4d0275fa660-dirty #79
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0
__lock_acquire+0x10f2/0x1ca0
lock_acquire+0xbe/0x2d0
__mutex_lock+0x6d/0x400
demote_store+0x244/0x460
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x12c/0x1d0
vfs_write+0x380/0x540
ksys_write+0x64/0xe0
do_syscall_64+0xb9/0x1d0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7fa61db14887
RSP: 002b:00007ffc56c48358 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007fa61db14887
RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 000055a030050220 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: 000055a030050220 R08: 00007fa61dbd1460 R09: 000000007fffffff
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
R13: 00007fa61dc1b780 R14: 00007fa61dc17600 R15: 00007fa61dc16a00
</TASK>
Lockdep considers this an AA deadlock because the different resize_lock
mutexes reside in the same lockdep class, but this is a false positive.
Place them in distinct classes to avoid these warnings.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: 8531fc6 ("hugetlb: add hugetlb demote page support")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
sysopenci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2024
[ Upstream commit 3e7917c0cdad835a5121520fc5686d954b7a61ab ]
linkwatch_event() grabs possibly very contended RTNL mutex.
system_wq is not suitable for such work.
Inspired by many noisy syzbot reports.
3 locks held by kworker/0:7/5266:
#0: ffff888015480948 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3206 [inline]
#0: ffff888015480948 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x90a/0x1830 kernel/workqueue.c:3312
#1: ffffc90003f6fd00 ((linkwatch_work).work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3207 [inline]
, at: process_scheduled_works+0x945/0x1830 kernel/workqueue.c:3312
#2: ffffffff8fa6f208 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: linkwatch_event+0xe/0x60 net/core/link_watch.c:276
Reported-by: syzbot <[email protected]>
Fixes: 1da177e ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
sysopenci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2024
[ Upstream commit 86a41ea9fd79ddb6145cb8ebf5aeafceabca6f7d ] When l2tp tunnels use a socket provided by userspace, we can hit lockdep splats like the below when data is transmitted through another (unrelated) userspace socket which then gets routed over l2tp. This issue was previously discussed here: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/ The solution is to have lockdep treat socket locks of l2tp tunnel sockets separately than those of standard INET sockets. To do so, use a different lockdep subclass where lock nesting is possible. ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.10.0+ #34 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- iperf3/771 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8881027601d8 (slock-AF_INET/1){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0 but task is already holding lock: ffff888102650d98 (slock-AF_INET/1){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: tcp_v4_rcv+0x1848/0x1e10 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_INET/1); lock(slock-AF_INET/1); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 10 locks held by iperf3/771: #0: ffff888102650258 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: tcp_sendmsg+0x1a/0x40 #1: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x4b/0xbc0 #2: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x17a/0x1130 #3: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x28b/0x9f0 #4: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0xf9/0x260 projectceladon#5: ffff888102650d98 (slock-AF_INET/1){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: tcp_v4_rcv+0x1848/0x1e10 projectceladon#6: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x4b/0xbc0 projectceladon#7: ffffffff822ac220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x17a/0x1130 projectceladon#8: ffffffff822ac1e0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0xcc/0x1450 projectceladon#9: ffff888101f33258 (dev->qdisc_tx_busylock ?: &qdisc_tx_busylock#2){+...}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x513/0x1450 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 771 Comm: iperf3 Not tainted 6.10.0+ #34 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x69/0xa0 dump_stack+0xc/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x135d/0x2600 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 lock_acquire+0xc4/0x2a0 ? l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0 ? __skb_checksum+0xa3/0x540 _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x35/0x50 ? l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0 l2tp_xmit_skb+0x243/0x9d0 l2tp_eth_dev_xmit+0x3c/0xc0 dev_hard_start_xmit+0x11e/0x420 sch_direct_xmit+0xc3/0x640 __dev_queue_xmit+0x61c/0x1450 ? ip_finish_output2+0xf4c/0x1130 ip_finish_output2+0x6b6/0x1130 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380 ip_output+0x99/0x120 __ip_queue_xmit+0xae4/0xbc0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? tcp_options_write.constprop.0+0xcb/0x3e0 ip_queue_xmit+0x34/0x40 __tcp_transmit_skb+0x1625/0x1890 __tcp_send_ack+0x1b8/0x340 tcp_send_ack+0x23/0x30 __tcp_ack_snd_check+0xa8/0x530 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 tcp_rcv_established+0x412/0xd70 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x299/0x420 tcp_v4_rcv+0x1991/0x1e10 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x50/0x220 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x158/0x260 ip_local_deliver+0xc8/0xe0 ip_rcv+0xe5/0x1d0 ? __pfx_ip_rcv+0x10/0x10 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0xce/0xe0 ? process_backlog+0x28b/0x9f0 __netif_receive_skb+0x34/0xd0 ? process_backlog+0x28b/0x9f0 process_backlog+0x2cb/0x9f0 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0x61/0x280 net_rx_action+0x332/0x670 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 handle_softirqs+0xda/0x480 ? __dev_queue_xmit+0xa2c/0x1450 do_softirq+0xa1/0xd0 </IRQ> <TASK> __local_bh_enable_ip+0xc8/0xe0 ? __dev_queue_xmit+0xa2c/0x1450 __dev_queue_xmit+0xa48/0x1450 ? ip_finish_output2+0xf4c/0x1130 ip_finish_output2+0x6b6/0x1130 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x380 ip_output+0x99/0x120 __ip_queue_xmit+0xae4/0xbc0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? tcp_options_write.constprop.0+0xcb/0x3e0 ip_queue_xmit+0x34/0x40 __tcp_transmit_skb+0x1625/0x1890 tcp_write_xmit+0x766/0x2fb0 ? __entry_text_end+0x102ba9/0x102bad ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __might_fault+0x74/0xc0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x56/0x190 tcp_push+0x117/0x310 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x14c1/0x1740 tcp_sendmsg+0x28/0x40 inet_sendmsg+0x5d/0x90 sock_write_iter+0x242/0x2b0 vfs_write+0x68d/0x800 ? __pfx_sock_write_iter+0x10/0x10 ksys_write+0xc8/0xf0 __x64_sys_write+0x3d/0x50 x64_sys_call+0xfaf/0x1f50 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f4d143af992 Code: c3 8b 07 85 c0 75 24 49 89 fb 48 89 f0 48 89 d7 48 89 ce 4c 89 c2 4d 89 ca 4c 8b 44 24 08 4c 8b 4c 24 10 4c 89 5c 24 08 0f 05 <c3> e9 01 cc ff ff 41 54 b8 02 00 00 0 RSP: 002b:00007ffd65032058 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f4d143af992 RDX: 0000000000000025 RSI: 00007f4d143f3bcc RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007f4d143f2b28 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f4d143f3bcc R13: 0000000000000005 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007ffd650323f0 </TASK> Fixes: 0b2c59720e65 ("l2tp: close all race conditions in l2tp_tunnel_register()") Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> Reported-by: [email protected] Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=6acef9e0a4d1f46c83d4 CC: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Signed-off-by: James Chapman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tom Parkin <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
sysopenci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2024
…pinlock_t'
[ Upstream commit f872d4af79fe8c71ae291ce8875b477e1669a6c7 ]
This lock is acquired under irq_desc::lock with interrupts disabled.
When PREEMPT_RT is enabled, 'spinlock_t' becomes preemptible, which results
in invalid lock acquire context;
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
swapper/0/1 is trying to lock:
ffff0000008fed30 (&ctl->lock){....}-{3:3}, at: meson_gpio_irq_update_bits0
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{5:5}
3 locks held by swapper/0/1:
#0: ffff0000003cd0f8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __driver_attach+0x90c
#1: ffff000004714650 (&desc->request_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq0
#2: ffff0000047144c8 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.9.9-sdkernel #1
Call trace:
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x60/0x88
meson_gpio_irq_update_bits+0x34/0x70
meson8_gpio_irq_set_type+0x78/0xc4
meson_gpio_irq_set_type+0x30/0x60
__irq_set_trigger+0x60/0x180
__setup_irq+0x30c/0x6e0
request_threaded_irq+0xec/0x1a4
Fixes: 215f4cc ("irqchip/meson: Add support for gpio interrupt controller")
Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
sysopenci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2024
Chi Zhiling reported:
We found a null pointer accessing in tracefs[1], the reason is that the
variable 'ei_child' is set to LIST_POISON1, that means the list was
removed in eventfs_remove_rec. so when access the ei_child->is_freed, the
panic triggered.
by the way, the following script can reproduce this panic
loop1 (){
while true
do
echo "p:kp submit_bio" > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
echo "" > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events
done
}
loop2 (){
while true
do
tree /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/
done
}
loop1 &
loop2
[1]:
[ 1147.959632][T17331] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address dead000000000150
[ 1147.968239][T17331] Mem abort info:
[ 1147.971739][T17331] ESR = 0x0000000096000004
[ 1147.976172][T17331] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[ 1147.982171][T17331] SET = 0, FnV = 0
[ 1147.985906][T17331] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[ 1147.989734][T17331] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
[ 1147.995292][T17331] Data abort info:
[ 1147.998858][T17331] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000
[ 1148.005023][T17331] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
[ 1148.010759][T17331] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
[ 1148.016752][T17331] [dead000000000150] address between user and kernel address ranges
[ 1148.024571][T17331] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] SMP
[ 1148.030825][T17331] Modules linked in: team_mode_loadbalance team nlmon act_gact cls_flower sch_ingress bonding tls macvlan dummy ib_core bridge stp llc veth amdgpu amdxcp mfd_core gpu_sched drm_exec drm_buddy radeon crct10dif_ce video drm_suballoc_helper ghash_ce drm_ttm_helper sha2_ce ttm sha256_arm64 i2c_algo_bit sha1_ce sbsa_gwdt cp210x drm_display_helper cec sr_mod cdrom drm_kms_helper binfmt_misc sg loop fuse drm dm_mod nfnetlink ip_tables autofs4 [last unloaded: tls]
[ 1148.072808][T17331] CPU: 3 PID: 17331 Comm: ls Tainted: G W ------- ---- 6.6.43 #2
[ 1148.081751][T17331] Source Version: 21b3b386e948bedd29369af66f3e98ab01b1c650
[ 1148.088783][T17331] Hardware name: Greatwall GW-001M1A-FTF/GW-001M1A-FTF, BIOS KunLun BIOS V4.0 07/16/2020
[ 1148.098419][T17331] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 1148.106060][T17331] pc : eventfs_iterate+0x2c0/0x398
[ 1148.111017][T17331] lr : eventfs_iterate+0x2fc/0x398
[ 1148.115969][T17331] sp : ffff80008d56bbd0
[ 1148.119964][T17331] x29: ffff80008d56bbf0 x28: ffff001ff5be2600 x27: 0000000000000000
[ 1148.127781][T17331] x26: ffff001ff52ca4e0 x25: 0000000000009977 x24: dead000000000100
[ 1148.135598][T17331] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 000000000000000b x21: ffff800082645f10
[ 1148.143415][T17331] x20: ffff001fddf87c70 x19: ffff80008d56bc90 x18: 0000000000000000
[ 1148.151231][T17331] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: ffff001ff52ca4e0
[ 1148.159048][T17331] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
[ 1148.166864][T17331] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : ffff8000804391d0
[ 1148.174680][T17331] x8 : 0000000180000000 x7 : 0000000000000018 x6 : 0000aaab04b92862
[ 1148.182498][T17331] x5 : 0000aaab04b92862 x4 : 0000000080000000 x3 : 0000000000000068
[ 1148.190314][T17331] x2 : 000000000000000f x1 : 0000000000007ea8 x0 : 0000000000000001
[ 1148.198131][T17331] Call trace:
[ 1148.201259][T17331] eventfs_iterate+0x2c0/0x398
[ 1148.205864][T17331] iterate_dir+0x98/0x188
[ 1148.210036][T17331] __arm64_sys_getdents64+0x78/0x160
[ 1148.215161][T17331] invoke_syscall+0x78/0x108
[ 1148.219593][T17331] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x48/0xf0
[ 1148.224977][T17331] do_el0_svc+0x24/0x38
[ 1148.228974][T17331] el0_svc+0x40/0x168
[ 1148.232798][T17331] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x130
[ 1148.237836][T17331] el0t_64_sync+0x1a4/0x1a8
[ 1148.242182][T17331] Code: 54ffff6c f9400676 910006d6 f9000676 (b9405300)
[ 1148.248955][T17331] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
The issue is that list_del() is used on an SRCU protected list variable
before the synchronization occurs. This can poison the list pointers while
there is a reader iterating the list.
This is simply fixed by using list_del_rcu() that is specifically made for
this purpose.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/[email protected]/
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
Fixes: 43aa6f97c2d03 ("eventfs: Get rid of dentry pointers without refcounts")
Reported-by: Chi Zhiling <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Chi Zhiling <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit d2603279c7d645bf0d11fa253b23f1ab48fc8d3c)
BUG=b:360162015
TEST=find /sys/kernel/tracing
Signed-off-by: Linux Patches Robot <linux-patches-robot@chromeos-missing-patches.google.com.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Change-Id: Iea03fdda99562a1af19739314e3cca36b92548b4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/5843228
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Sarthak Kukreti <[email protected]>
Commit-Queue: Sarthak Kukreti <[email protected]>
sysopenci
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 14, 2024
[ Upstream commit bd44ca3de49cc1badcff7a96010fa2c64f04868c ] Currently the dma debugging code can end up indirectly calling printk under the radix_lock. This happens when a radix tree node allocation fails. This is a problem because the printk code, when used together with netconsole, can end up inside the dma debugging code while trying to transmit a message over netcons. This creates the possibility of either a circular deadlock on the same CPU, with that CPU trying to grab the radix_lock twice, or an ABBA deadlock between different CPUs, where one CPU grabs the console lock first and then waits for the radix_lock, while the other CPU is holding the radix_lock and is waiting for the console lock. The trace captured by lockdep is of the ABBA variant. -> #2 (&dma_entry_hash[i].lock){-.-.}-{2:2}: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5a/0x90 debug_dma_map_page+0x79/0x180 dma_map_page_attrs+0x1d2/0x2f0 bnxt_start_xmit+0x8c6/0x1540 netpoll_start_xmit+0x13f/0x180 netpoll_send_skb+0x20d/0x320 netpoll_send_udp+0x453/0x4a0 write_ext_msg+0x1b9/0x460 console_flush_all+0x2ff/0x5a0 console_unlock+0x55/0x180 vprintk_emit+0x2e3/0x3c0 devkmsg_emit+0x5a/0x80 devkmsg_write+0xfd/0x180 do_iter_readv_writev+0x164/0x1b0 vfs_writev+0xf9/0x2b0 do_writev+0x6d/0x110 do_syscall_64+0x80/0x150 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 -> #0 (console_owner){-.-.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x15d1/0x31a0 lock_acquire+0xe8/0x290 console_flush_all+0x2ea/0x5a0 console_unlock+0x55/0x180 vprintk_emit+0x2e3/0x3c0 _printk+0x59/0x80 warn_alloc+0x122/0x1b0 __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x1101/0x1120 __alloc_pages+0x1eb/0x2c0 alloc_slab_page+0x5f/0x150 new_slab+0x2dc/0x4e0 ___slab_alloc+0xdcb/0x1390 kmem_cache_alloc+0x23d/0x360 radix_tree_node_alloc+0x3c/0xf0 radix_tree_insert+0xf5/0x230 add_dma_entry+0xe9/0x360 dma_map_page_attrs+0x1d2/0x2f0 __bnxt_alloc_rx_frag+0x147/0x180 bnxt_alloc_rx_data+0x79/0x160 bnxt_rx_skb+0x29/0xc0 bnxt_rx_pkt+0xe22/0x1570 __bnxt_poll_work+0x101/0x390 bnxt_poll+0x7e/0x320 __napi_poll+0x29/0x160 net_rx_action+0x1e0/0x3e0 handle_softirqs+0x190/0x510 run_ksoftirqd+0x4e/0x90 smpboot_thread_fn+0x1a8/0x270 kthread+0x102/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 This bug is more likely than it seems, because when one CPU has run out of memory, chances are the other has too. The good news is, this bug is hidden behind the CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG, so not many users are likely to trigger it. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Reported-by: Konstantin Ovsepian <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
JeevakaPrabu
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 4, 2024
[ Upstream commit f9ff7665cd128012868098bbd07e28993e314fdb ] Fix a kernel panic in the br_netfilter module when sending untagged traffic via a VxLAN device. This happens during the check for fragmentation in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit. It is dependent on: 1) the br_netfilter module being loaded; 2) net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables set to 1; 3) a bridge with a VxLAN (single-vxlan-device) netdevice as a bridge port; 4) untagged frames with size higher than the VxLAN MTU forwarded/flooded When forwarding the untagged packet to the VxLAN bridge port, before the netfilter hooks are called, br_handle_egress_vlan_tunnel is called and changes the skb_dst to the tunnel dst. The tunnel_dst is a metadata type of dst, i.e., skb_valid_dst(skb) is false, and metadata->dst.dev is NULL. Then in the br_netfilter hooks, in br_nf_dev_queue_xmit, there's a check for frames that needs to be fragmented: frames with higher MTU than the VxLAN device end up calling br_nf_ip_fragment, which in turns call ip_skb_dst_mtu. The ip_dst_mtu tries to use the skb_dst(skb) as if it was a valid dst with valid dst->dev, thus the crash. This case was never supported in the first place, so drop the packet instead. PING 10.0.0.2 (10.0.0.2) from 0.0.0.0 h1-eth0: 2000(2028) bytes of data. [ 176.291791] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000110 [ 176.292101] Mem abort info: [ 176.292184] ESR = 0x0000000096000004 [ 176.292322] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 176.292530] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 176.292709] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 176.292862] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 176.293013] Data abort info: [ 176.293104] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 176.293488] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 176.293787] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 176.293995] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000043ef5000 [ 176.294166] [0000000000000110] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 [ 176.294827] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 176.295252] Modules linked in: vxlan ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel veth br_netfilter bridge stp llc ipv6 crct10dif_ce [ 176.295923] CPU: 0 PID: 188 Comm: ping Not tainted 6.8.0-rc3-g5b3fbd61b9d1 #2 [ 176.296314] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) [ 176.296535] pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 176.296808] pc : br_nf_dev_queue_xmit+0x390/0x4ec [br_netfilter] [ 176.297382] lr : br_nf_dev_queue_xmit+0x2ac/0x4ec [br_netfilter] [ 176.297636] sp : ffff800080003630 [ 176.297743] x29: ffff800080003630 x28: 0000000000000008 x27: ffff6828c49ad9f8 [ 176.298093] x26: ffff6828c49ad000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 00000000000003e8 [ 176.298430] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffff6828c4960b40 x21: ffff6828c3b16d28 [ 176.298652] x20: ffff6828c3167048 x19: ffff6828c3b16d00 x18: 0000000000000014 [ 176.298926] x17: ffffb0476322f000 x16: ffffb7e164023730 x15: 0000000095744632 [ 176.299296] x14: ffff6828c3f1c880 x13: 0000000000000002 x12: ffffb7e137926a70 [ 176.299574] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffff6828c3f1c898 x9 : 0000000000000000 [ 176.300049] x8 : ffff6828c49bf070 x7 : 0008460f18d5f20e x6 : f20e0100bebafeca [ 176.300302] x5 : ffff6828c7f918fe x4 : ffff6828c49bf070 x3 : 0000000000000000 [ 176.300586] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff6828c3c7ad00 x0 : ffff6828c7f918f0 [ 176.300889] Call trace: [ 176.301123] br_nf_dev_queue_xmit+0x390/0x4ec [br_netfilter] [ 176.301411] br_nf_post_routing+0x2a8/0x3e4 [br_netfilter] [ 176.301703] nf_hook_slow+0x48/0x124 [ 176.302060] br_forward_finish+0xc8/0xe8 [bridge] [ 176.302371] br_nf_hook_thresh+0x124/0x134 [br_netfilter] [ 176.302605] br_nf_forward_finish+0x118/0x22c [br_netfilter] [ 176.302824] br_nf_forward_ip.part.0+0x264/0x290 [br_netfilter] [ 176.303136] br_nf_forward+0x2b8/0x4e0 [br_netfilter] [ 176.303359] nf_hook_slow+0x48/0x124 [ 176.303803] __br_forward+0xc4/0x194 [bridge] [ 176.304013] br_flood+0xd4/0x168 [bridge] [ 176.304300] br_handle_frame_finish+0x1d4/0x5c4 [bridge] [ 176.304536] br_nf_hook_thresh+0x124/0x134 [br_netfilter] [ 176.304978] br_nf_pre_routing_finish+0x29c/0x494 [br_netfilter] [ 176.305188] br_nf_pre_routing+0x250/0x524 [br_netfilter] [ 176.305428] br_handle_frame+0x244/0x3cc [bridge] [ 176.305695] __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0x33c/0xecc [ 176.306080] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x40/0x8c [ 176.306197] __netif_receive_skb+0x18/0x64 [ 176.306369] process_backlog+0x80/0x124 [ 176.306540] __napi_poll+0x38/0x17c [ 176.306636] net_rx_action+0x124/0x26c [ 176.306758] __do_softirq+0x100/0x26c [ 176.307051] ____do_softirq+0x10/0x1c [ 176.307162] call_on_irq_stack+0x24/0x4c [ 176.307289] do_softirq_own_stack+0x1c/0x2c [ 176.307396] do_softirq+0x54/0x6c [ 176.307485] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x8c/0x98 [ 176.307637] __dev_queue_xmit+0x22c/0xd28 [ 176.307775] neigh_resolve_output+0xf4/0x1a0 [ 176.308018] ip_finish_output2+0x1c8/0x628 [ 176.308137] ip_do_fragment+0x5b4/0x658 [ 176.308279] ip_fragment.constprop.0+0x48/0xec [ 176.308420] __ip_finish_output+0xa4/0x254 [ 176.308593] ip_finish_output+0x34/0x130 [ 176.308814] ip_output+0x6c/0x108 [ 176.308929] ip_send_skb+0x50/0xf0 [ 176.309095] ip_push_pending_frames+0x30/0x54 [ 176.309254] raw_sendmsg+0x758/0xaec [ 176.309568] inet_sendmsg+0x44/0x70 [ 176.309667] __sys_sendto+0x110/0x178 [ 176.309758] __arm64_sys_sendto+0x28/0x38 [ 176.309918] invoke_syscall+0x48/0x110 [ 176.310211] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0 [ 176.310353] do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 [ 176.310434] el0_svc+0x34/0xb4 [ 176.310551] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x12c [ 176.310690] el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 [ 176.311066] Code: f9402e61 79402aa2 927ff821 f9400023 (f9408860) [ 176.315743] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 176.316060] Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception in interrupt [ 176.316371] Kernel Offset: 0x37e0e3000000 from 0xffff800080000000 [ 176.316564] PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffff97d780000000 [ 176.316782] CPU features: 0x0,88000203,3c020000,0100421b [ 176.317210] Memory Limit: none [ 176.317527] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal Exception in interrupt ]---\ Fixes: 11538d0 ("bridge: vlan dst_metadata hooks in ingress and egress paths") Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andy Roulin <[email protected]> Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The Python based GUI tool for Turbostat currently displays data of a single output or single csv file.
Ref: #1
The tool should provide support to view multiple data/graph. The following are the requirements:
a. If user chooses single graph, then only single view will be shown. If user chooses two or more files, then as many view will be shown.
b. Show two graphs side by side in 1X1 (2 tiles) view and then tile them in rows 2X2 (4 tiles) (a max view of 4 tiles is enough)
c. If one graphs is zoomed, then the other graphs can also zoom automatically in the respective scales & dimensions.
d. Each graph will have its own titles and the scales. However, the CPU items (like Buzy_MHz, CoreTemp, Pkgwatt etc) will be same for all the graphs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: