Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Tagging @wisbech and @MartinSchmidt, as they may have inputs/opinions for this. :-) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Create issue from this discussion, the change will be made, and can be tracked in the issue #109 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Implementation wise we are never transfering certificates but rather slices of quantities of energy.
However the API is as follows
TransferCertificate(FederatedCertifcateId, ShieldedValue, Key, PublicKey)
This is used to transfer a Granular Certificate slice from the current owner to a new owner.
Would it be better if it had slice in the API call, to indicate that we actually transfer a slice and not the certificate?
TransferCertificateSlice(FederatedCertifcateId, ShieldedValue, Key, PublicKey)
This is used to transfer a Granular Certificate slice from the current owner to a new owner.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions