Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support for dirty scheduler #25

Open
JustMikey opened this issue Sep 25, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Support for dirty scheduler #25

JustMikey opened this issue Sep 25, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@JustMikey
Copy link

I was wondering if it makes sense to add support for dirty schedulers and if so, if you have any plans for do it?
@zinid
Copy link
Contributor

zinid commented Sep 25, 2017

Dirty schedulers is interesting stuff, however, we don't find any significant locking during current NIF executions (at least in ejabberd stress tests). So, this is not something we're going to implement soon. If you have another opinion, please tell us.
I mark this issue as a feature though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@zinid @JustMikey