Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Keyoxide PGP #2010

Closed
dngray opened this issue Feb 18, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

Keyoxide PGP #2010

dngray opened this issue Feb 18, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
c:software self-hosted/decentralized software and related topics status:approved issues that are immediately approved, submit a PR!

Comments

@dngray
Copy link
Member

dngray commented Feb 18, 2023

Discussed in https://github.com/privacyguides/privacyguides.org/discussions/326

Originally posted by ignoramous November 16, 2021

Keyoxide allows you to prove "ownership" of accounts on websites, domain names, IM, etc., regardless of your username.

That last part is important: You could, for example, be alice on Lobste.rs, but @alice24 on Twitter. And if your website is thatcoder.tld, how are people supposed to know that all that online property is yours?

The Keyoxide project is licensed under AGPL-3.0-or-later.

https://docs.keyoxide.org/getting-started/what-is-keyoxide/

@dngray dngray added c:software self-hosted/decentralized software and related topics status:approved issues that are immediately approved, submit a PR! labels Feb 18, 2023
@dngray
Copy link
Member Author

dngray commented Feb 18, 2023

I'm thinking this could be an interesting addition with #1686.

I think this does somewhat relate to privacy, particularly when using self hosted services, you'd need some sort of method to tie those credentials together. In the past we used Keybase, however the future of that is unlikely.

Most people opt to simply list credentials on their blog or website, but that doesn't have any cryptographic check.

@jonaharagon
Copy link
Member

Most people opt to simply list credentials on their blog or website, but that doesn't have any cryptographic check.

To be honest, I'm not sure what value a cryptographic signature provides in this particular case.

@privacyguides privacyguides deleted a comment from rnaprinciple Mar 1, 2023
@privacyguides-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

This issue has been mentioned on Privacy Guides. There might be relevant details there:

https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/keyoxide-keybase-alternative/9564/9

@dngray
Copy link
Member Author

dngray commented Mar 9, 2023

@dngray dngray closed this as completed Mar 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c:software self-hosted/decentralized software and related topics status:approved issues that are immediately approved, submit a PR!
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants