-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feedback #489
Comments
Thanks for the feedback, this is something that was brought up by several people. We will try using % but unfortunately we cannot use decimals for allocation so spending all credits would be difficult, so we gotta figure that part out. Also please not you can directly type the desired allocation on top of incrementing by 1 |
We got the following suggestions to related but not quite the same problem:
Would these make it easier in your opinion? @tesaho |
Sliders would be good if entering numbers is too difficult. Thank you for
following up!
…On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 4:17 AM aguzmant103 ***@***.***> wrote:
We got the following suggestions to related but not quite the same problem:
- Instead of giving away votes directly, you split your 1000 "voting
power" into the projects, and using quadratic voting, we then show how this
maps to "effective votes" (rounded to the lowest integer)
- Use sliders to divide your voting power
- Use an "auto-split" button to allocate voting power
Would these make it easier in your opinion? @tesaho
<https://github.com/tesaho>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#489 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL2ODS2TZA2OF2WZ7TCXSF32CYSGTAVCNFSM6AAAAABRXZ75TWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKMBUG4YDONBWGM>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***
com>
|
The vote allocation should be as a % of 100 to make it easier for users. I was unable to use my total vote allocation because I could only incremental update a vote by 1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: