Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PouchDB 6.2.0 - db.type() is deprecated #63

Closed
tcoats opened this issue May 9, 2017 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #64
Closed

PouchDB 6.2.0 - db.type() is deprecated #63

tcoats opened this issue May 9, 2017 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #64

Comments

@tcoats
Copy link

tcoats commented May 9, 2017

I believe this repo needs upgrading to avoid this deprecated warning.

db.type() is deprecated and will be removed in a future version of PouchDB

@bioleyl
Copy link

bioleyl commented Jul 18, 2017

Same problem for me. Would be perfect to avoid this warning because it fires thousand times in the console when we dump.

@pubkey
Copy link

pubkey commented Nov 4, 2017

Is anyone working on a PR for this?

@cepm-nate
Copy link

cepm-nate commented Jan 24, 2018

According to pouchdb/pouchdb#6106, all this repo needs is this._remote = true added somewhere.... @nolanlawson, I can give it a shot, but don't know the internals like you do. Anyone want to give it a shot?

@AdrianoFerrari
Copy link
Member

Seemed like a straight-forward fix (using other pouchdb libraries as reference for how they handled this).
Can the PR #74 be merged, @nolanlawson ?

AdrianoFerrari added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 16, 2018
"Remote false" flag added, to avoid "db.type() is deprecated" warning (Fixes #63).
@abhishiv
Copy link

abhishiv commented May 4, 2019

Hey guys, I'm using 1.2.9 but still seeing this log. Am I missing something?

@lgarron
Copy link

lgarron commented Oct 29, 2022

This... still seems to be an issue. 😕

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

8 participants