-
Just curious about the choice of license, especially one not approved by the OSI. AGPLv3 suffices for individual RStudio use while offering that IDE in an enterprise product, so wondering what's different in Positron's case. Should I be concerned that Positron won't be free in the future or is this an artifact of other components of the IDE that aren't open source or can't be made open source? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 5 replies
-
Positron will always be free (just like RStudio). Our choice of the Elastic license over AGPL for Positron has a lot to do with our experience with RStudio and the way its license was occasionally abused (obviously can't go into details about that here). If you read the license terms in detail you'll find that despite not being OSI approved (due to the hosting clause), the Elastic license is simpler and grants more freedom than the AGPL in many ways. We were able to bring some parts of Positron under the MIT license, including a new high-performance R backend that can be used with other IDEs. We've got more info on our wiki here: https://github.com/posit-dev/positron/wiki/Licensing |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Positron will always be free (just like RStudio). Our choice of the Elastic license over AGPL for Positron has a lot to do with our experience with RStudio and the way its license was occasionally abused (obviously can't go into details about that here). If you read the license terms in detail you'll find that despite not being OSI approved (due to the hosting clause), the Elastic license is simpler and grants more freedom than the AGPL in many ways.
We were able to bring some parts of Positron under the MIT license, including a new high-performance R backend that can be used with other IDEs.
We've got more info on our wiki here: https://github.com/posit-dev/positron/wiki/Licensing