Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request to add "URL Base" for use with reverse proxy #42

Open
Kickbut101 opened this issue Jun 14, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Request to add "URL Base" for use with reverse proxy #42

Kickbut101 opened this issue Jun 14, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Kickbut101
Copy link

Kickbut101 commented Jun 14, 2021

As it stands if I'm hosting multiple things on the same reverse proxy the booksonic server ends up dropping my url base I entered for the proxy and not connecting properly.

I believe this used to work on the "Legacy" Booksonic server

Current usage if I visit https://myaddress.com/booksonic the connection just drops the /booksonic and it doesn't connect

Ideally we'd want the server to respond to https://myaddress.com/booksonic and persist that appended /booksonic

@wtanksleyjr
Copy link

wtanksleyjr commented Jun 14, 2021 via email

@Kickbut101
Copy link
Author

For #28 I actually also had that issue on legacy booksonic. I just kind of ignored it and worked around it as the user suggested.

And for #33 it might be related to that. Unsure. The behavior seems right. I haven't nailed down if it's demoting my HTTPS to HTTP.

@popeen popeen added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 17, 2021
@wtanksleyjr
Copy link

Check out the last comment in issue #33, it solved the problem for me with a single line added to a single configuration file (although, fair warning, that configuration file contains a warning that it's automatically generated and not to modify it, so it's probably not the right solution but since it worked instantly I used it).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants