You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I create a new database and I only update the cement industry, there are some cement production typew for which the clinker is not linked to the regional clinker market but to clinker production. Thus, it is not taking into account the adoption of CCS in the clinker production for this regions. Example ("model": "image", "pathway": "SSP2-RCP26", "year": 2050. From Ecoinvent v3.9.1 cutoff):
39.8% of 'cement production, Portland (RoW)' comes from 'cement production, Portland (INDIA)'. However, the clinker input for 'cement production, Portland (INDIA)' is 'clinker production (INDIA)', instead of 'market for clinker production (INDIA)'. This is very influential in the climate change results, as 'clinker production (INDIA)' emits ~1.02 kgCO2/kg cement, while 'market for clinker (INDIA) emits ~0.65 kgCO2/kg cement.
The same happens for other regional markets. Also when trying other IMAGE pathways. Am I overlooking something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @kebamba,
I understand the issue. That is because some cement production datasets in the original ecoinvent database use the clinker production dataset directly, not the market. I'll fix this and will let you know.
72f656e fixes the issue. You can pip install directly from the repo to try it out or wait for the next 1.2.4 release (maybe later today). Re-open the issue is not solved.
When I create a new database and I only update the cement industry, there are some cement production typew for which the clinker is not linked to the regional clinker market but to clinker production. Thus, it is not taking into account the adoption of CCS in the clinker production for this regions. Example ("model": "image", "pathway": "SSP2-RCP26", "year": 2050. From Ecoinvent v3.9.1 cutoff):
39.8% of 'cement production, Portland (RoW)' comes from 'cement production, Portland (INDIA)'. However, the clinker input for 'cement production, Portland (INDIA)' is 'clinker production (INDIA)', instead of 'market for clinker production (INDIA)'. This is very influential in the climate change results, as 'clinker production (INDIA)' emits ~1.02 kgCO2/kg cement, while 'market for clinker (INDIA) emits ~0.65 kgCO2/kg cement.
The same happens for other regional markets. Also when trying other IMAGE pathways. Am I overlooking something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: