Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle SUT panic gracefully #234

Open
symbiont-daniel-gustafsson opened this issue Apr 23, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Handle SUT panic gracefully #234

symbiont-daniel-gustafsson opened this issue Apr 23, 2021 · 0 comments
Milestone

Comments

@symbiont-daniel-gustafsson
Copy link
Contributor

Currently if SUT panics the executor will also panic, it would be good to handle this a bit more gracefully.

The executor should detect that if SUT panics, if so it should return to scheduler with information to Scheduler that the SUT crashed. We can also create a new event, that is emitted from executor/scheduler when SUT crash.
The executor could try to get the last state of the reactor that crashed and emit that.
The scheduler could emit it current state, and then finish

All checkers should probably check if such an event was emitted, if so fail directly.

@symbiont-stevan-andjelkovic symbiont-stevan-andjelkovic added this to the v0.1.0 milestone Jun 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants