You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 14, 2024. It is now read-only.
At the bank code meeting today, we talked about how compiling the list of accounts that are unlocked on some cluster can be sped up:
The find_unlocked_account_names function returns a dictionary object with clusters as the keys and the list of unlocked accounts as the values. The key/value pair is not being utilized elsewhere however (need to double check this), so converting this to a set will help streamline how it is used in update_status.
At the level of the account lock state iteration, we could stop and continue on to the next account name if it is found to be locked on any cluster (currently iterating over all accounts on each cluster regardless).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
At the bank code meeting today, we talked about how compiling the list of accounts that are unlocked on some cluster can be sped up:
The
find_unlocked_account_names
function returns a dictionary object with clusters as the keys and the list of unlocked accounts as the values. The key/value pair is not being utilized elsewhere however (need to double check this), so converting this to a set will help streamline how it is used inupdate_status
.At the level of the account lock state iteration, we could stop and continue on to the next account name if it is found to be locked on any cluster (currently iterating over all accounts on each cluster regardless).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: