You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Many of the examples have private data. So is it possible have same functionality implemented without having to commit private data.
May be access private data from local encrypted source where keys are outside any repo and protection where it is not accidentally committed by checking it is out side the repo / put in git ignore files for second level of protection.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
sirinath
changed the title
Same Functionality Without Private Data
Same Functionality Without Private Data Risks
Dec 22, 2014
Local encrypted source, does it need to be encrypted if it is not stored in
the repository?
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Suminda Dharmasena < [email protected]> wrote:
Many of the examples have private data. So is it possible have same
functionality implemented without having to commit private data.
May be access private data from local encrypted source where keys are
outside any repo and protection where it is not accidentally committed by
checking it is out side the repo / put in git ignore files for second level
of protection.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #28.
Many of the examples have private data. So is it possible have same functionality implemented without having to commit private data.
May be access private data from local encrypted source where keys are outside any repo and protection where it is not accidentally committed by checking it is out side the repo / put in git ignore files for second level of protection.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: