You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
I was thinking that it would be useful if the .yml file input to Pipeforge would be able to handle something like this...
schema:
myschema1
tables:
table1
table2
yourschema2
tables:
table3
table4
So I think we'd have to add a loop on schema surrounding our current code that loops through the tables.
Then in the tables.yml we'd just want it to output
source:
name: table1
schema: myschema1
Right now, when we are sourcing from a single database but multiple schemas, we're having to maintain the files and the outputs in separate directories. The above could cause some issues if the same table existed in multiple schemas, but we already would have similar issues in the target database if that's the case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
I was thinking that it would be useful if the .yml file input to Pipeforge would be able to handle something like this...
schema:
tables:
tables:
So I think we'd have to add a loop on schema surrounding our current code that loops through the tables.
Then in the tables.yml we'd just want it to output
source:
name: table1
schema: myschema1
Right now, when we are sourcing from a single database but multiple schemas, we're having to maintain the files and the outputs in separate directories. The above could cause some issues if the same table existed in multiple schemas, but we already would have similar issues in the target database if that's the case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: