You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi @peterlevi ,
Do you have plans for porting variety-slideshow to Python 3? If not, would you be willing to accept a PR if I contributed it?
The only dependency used in variety is the gi package... and python3-gi has been in the Ubuntu archive since 12.04. Besides gi.repository, the variety codebase uses only standard library modules... so that would be a straight forward effort to support Python 3.
There are basically 2 ways to approach Python 3 compatibility:
convert entire source to Python 3 syntax and drop Python 2 support
modify variety-slideshow so there is a single codebase that supports both Python2 and Python3 (with conditional imports and such)
Which way would you like to see variety go?
Thanks!
-Corey
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry for slow response, quite busy with work recently, not much time for the personal projects. But I'm happy to hear there's contributors' interest!
I hadn't planned on porting to Python 3, but, yes, I would accept a PR that makes it support both Python 2 and 3. Dropping Python 2 is a no-go for now, because variety-slideshow is (to some extent) part of Variety (https://launchpad.net/variety) which is Python 2 only, no plans to port that one for now, and I'd prefer Variety + Slideshow combined to require one Python version only on the machine, not both.
Hi @peterlevi ,
Do you have plans for porting variety-slideshow to Python 3? If not, would you be willing to accept a PR if I contributed it?
The only dependency used in variety is the
gi
package... andpython3-gi
has been in the Ubuntu archive since 12.04. Besidesgi.repository
, the variety codebase uses only standard library modules... so that would be a straight forward effort to support Python 3.There are basically 2 ways to approach Python 3 compatibility:
Which way would you like to see variety go?
Thanks!
-Corey
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: