-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Getty ATT periods as interpreted by DAINST in Chronontology #78
Comments
@atomrab Do we want to include the AAT period lists? I'm thinking “no,” but just wanted to check. |
Nevermind, I realized we can't include the period lists anyway, because they don't have timespans associated with them. |
It's a shame, because we miss a lot of stylistic period designations, but I think we have to leave these out. None of the ones I spot-checked are ongoing in the present, and if we find end-dates for them elsewhere, we're making assumptions that aren't original to the authority. |
Chronontology has a set of time periods from the Getty ATT to which they have added spatial coverage, making them suitable for inclusion in PeriodO.
This includes:
The authority metadata should make it clear that this is "The Getty AAT as interpreted by DAINST". In other words, these are the Getty ATT periods, but they have had some additional data added by DAINST.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: