Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rule that uses unasserted fact blows up. #19

Open
rvanderwall opened this issue Apr 29, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Rule that uses unasserted fact blows up. #19

rvanderwall opened this issue Apr 29, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@rvanderwall
Copy link

I have a rule that fires if a fact exists, so
A(X,Y) <= has_fact(X) & other_stuff(X,Y)

If I load up my WME and none of them happen to assert has_fact(), the rule throws an exception.
I can get around it by asserting and retracting a dummy rule like this:
+ has_fact('dummy')
- has_fact('dummy')

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant