You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
hello, i appreciate the logic for not reporting any mutations with supporting reads in bulk WGS, but this probably is redundant if there is matched high coverage bulk genome eg 100x WGS- even low clonal mutations might have supporting reads. Could there be an option to report separately the single cell putative sSNVs with a low number of matching bulk reads, (to be set manually)? Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We are indeed working on allowing the user to relax the bulk filter (i.e., currently 0 mutation supporting reads in bulk are tolerated; options to increase this by count or by VAF in bulk are being added).
The tricky part isn't changing those bulk filters, but rather re-assessing the tool's performance. We don't know how many false positives (either artifacts that bulks help to remove or germline mutations) will be included if the bulk filter is relaxed.
hello, i appreciate the logic for not reporting any mutations with supporting reads in bulk WGS, but this probably is redundant if there is matched high coverage bulk genome eg 100x WGS- even low clonal mutations might have supporting reads. Could there be an option to report separately the single cell putative sSNVs with a low number of matching bulk reads, (to be set manually)? Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: