Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PHP 5.6 EOL #159

Open
Jamesking56 opened this issue Jan 11, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

PHP 5.6 EOL #159

Jamesking56 opened this issue Jan 11, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@Jamesking56
Copy link

Hello,

Since PHP 5.* is now EOL across the board, should this package be marked as abandoned or some message be added to the top of the readme to tell users its no longer needed or supported?

As your Readme says, you're only responding to new issues regarding supported PHP versions, however this package doesn't provide anything for PHP 7.1+?

@divinity76
Copy link

an argument could be made for:

Zend maintains 5.6 until "at least" 31 December 2020, for their customers. (source: https://www.zend.com/en/support-center/support/php-long-term-support )

Debian LTS Team maintains 5.6 until 30 June 2020 (source: https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/ )

Canonical maintains 5.6 until April 2022 for their customers (source: https://ubuntu.com/blog/ubuntu-14-04-esm-support )

and i think Red Hat is maintaining a 5.6 branch too

@paragonie-scott
Copy link
Member

This is a polyfill library. It's kind of an exception to our usual policy.

@divinity76
Copy link

This is a polyfill library. It's kind of an exception to our usual policy.

but the README.md states

Although this library should function in earlier versions of PHP, we will only consider issues relevant to supported PHP versions.

  • as @Jamesking56 points out, that phrase makes little sense when there is zero relevant supported PHP versions

@paragonie-scott
Copy link
Member

That line of the README was written when PHP 5.4 was still supported. I don't see a lot of value in changing it (upgrading to PHP 7.x-latest is a good idea for many reasons), but yes, it's an anachronism when you read it today.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants