You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The Monthly Indicator Graph shows the monthly mean of a variable for each climatology and model. If there is a single run for the model, four lines are shown on the graph - one for 1971-2000, one for 2010-2039, one for 2040-2069, and one for 2070-2099, like this:
This graph is reasonably clear, but in cases where there are multiple runs of one model, the graph gets very chaotic.
I daresay nobody could make heads or tails of this.
Ideally each of the eight runs would use the same colours per climatology, so all eight 1971-2000 data would be one colour, all eight 2010-2039 a different colour, et cetera. It might also help to assign the four climatologies a natural-feeling "sequence" of colours, like 1971 green, 2010 yellow, 2040 orange, 2070 red or something.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The Monthly Indicator Graph shows the monthly mean of a variable for each climatology and model. If there is a single run for the model, four lines are shown on the graph - one for 1971-2000, one for 2010-2039, one for 2040-2069, and one for 2070-2099, like this:
This graph is reasonably clear, but in cases where there are multiple runs of one model, the graph gets very chaotic.
I daresay nobody could make heads or tails of this.
Ideally each of the eight runs would use the same colours per climatology, so all eight 1971-2000 data would be one colour, all eight 2010-2039 a different colour, et cetera. It might also help to assign the four climatologies a natural-feeling "sequence" of colours, like 1971 green, 2010 yellow, 2040 orange, 2070 red or something.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: